Hi, I found these pages informative:
https://i❤.ws <https://xn--i-7iq.ws> This is an emoji-oriented registrar... never fight emojis, it's like getting in a fist fight with the ocean. People will use them wherever they are allowed. >From there, they linked: http://unicode.org/faq/idn.html#10 You'll see there that UTS-46 is the most compatible thing, and it will win. Then, this page is further linked: https://features.icann.org/ssac-advisory-use-emoji-domain-names So, ICANN says not to do this, but people love emojis, so they lost here. thanks, Rob On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 10:59 AM Eliot Lear <l...@lear.ch> wrote: > I'm not going to characterize the group, but my suggestion would be to > focus on security considerations of the choices and see how things shake > out. > > Eliot > On 29.01.23 18:49, Rob Sayre wrote: > > Hi, > > That all sounds reasonable. But isn't this WG being incredibly > intransigent by default? It was like pulling teeth to get the last RFC to > say it's ok to ship only TLS 1.3 (2018), and now I guess we're refusing to > accept that there are emoji domain names, even though they obviously exist. > Maybe the best thing to do is break every rule from IDNA2008 that passes > UTS-46, and put it on the internet. I bet the WHATWG already did this, but > another effort couldn't hurt. > > thanks, > Rob > > On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 1:42 AM Eliot Lear <l...@lear.ch> wrote: > >> Hi Rob >> On 29.01.23 00:03, Rob Sayre wrote: >> >> The biggest value any internet standards organization provides is a >> global namespace. >> >> Different people have different values. To me, a global namespace is >> merely a means to one or more ends, and bigger may or may not be better. >> The ends I expect out of this organization are: >> >> 1. Utility >> 2. Interoperability >> 3. A reasonable (albeit not perfect) security profile for a function >> that implements the standard. >> >> It seems that different people order these things differently in priority >> (and they are not unrelated to one another), and are assessing (3) very >> differently. >> >> Eliot >> >> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Uta mailing listUta@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta > >
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
