It appears that Viktor Dukhovni <uta@ietf.org> said: >Though I coughed a small part of the suggested text, I am not >particulary in favour of going down this rabbit hole in the present >document. I don't think this is the place to settle the IDNA2008/UTS-46 >schism. Nor is it the role of this IETF document to effectively promote >neutrality. So long as the relevant IETF specification is IDNA2008, and >it takes a conservative posture, we can just reference it, and say as >little as possible about additional/alternative U-labels, beyond >explaining that this document works primarily with A-labels plus >Watson's consistency comments.
Well said. R's, John _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
