Thanks for your review, Marco, much appreciated. All your comments have been addressed in -14.
cheers, t On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 04:24, Marco Tiloca <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have re-read the document, and I think it's basically ready. > > Please find below just a few nits that I could notice. > > Best, > /Marco > > =================== > > - Section 12 > --- HPKE should actually be referred to as RFC 9180 > > - Section 17 > --- s/is is/is > > - Section 17.1.3 > --- s/utlize/utilize > > - Section 17.1.4 > --- s/in accordance to/in accordance with > > - Section 17.1.7 > --- s/the a post-handshake/a post-handshake > > - Section 17.4.1 > --- s/recommendations what/recommendations about what > --- s/identifer/identifier > --- s/recomments/recommends > > - Section 18 > --- s/has lead/has led > > - Section 19 > --- s/this document RECOMMENDS that/it is RECOMMENDED that > > (RECOMMENDS is not a term from BCP 14) > > - Section 20 > --- s/[RFC6979] ECDSA/ECDSA [RFC6979] > > -- > Marco Tiloca > Ph.D., Senior Researcher > > Phone: +46 (0)70 60 46 501 > > RISE Research Institutes of Sweden AB > Box 1263 > 164 29 Kista (Sweden) > > Division: Digital Systems > Department: Computer Science > Unit: Cybersecurity > > https://www.ri.se > > _______________________________________________ > Uta mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
