Maynard,
On Feb 16, 2008 1:07 AM, Maynard Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I have a requirement to build a kernel with both utrace and perfmon2 > patches. I'm using kernel version 2.6.24. Since neither of these > features are accepted upstream yet (well, Jim Keniston tells me that > some initial pieces of utrace have been accepted), the patches don't > play nicely with one another. The patches apply OK, but I get a compile > failure in perfmon/perfmon_syscalls.c because it's trying to use the > function ptrace_check_attach (removed by the utrace patch). A separate > note is being sent to the perfmon2 maintainer to see if he might help, > but I thought I'd post here as well, in case someone has gone into this > territory already. > I have responded to the other message. Currently, all the perfmon code needs is an equivalent to ptrack_check_attach(). I assume that a utrace kernel emulates the user level PTRACE interface.
