<disclaimer>
This has nothing to do with the textbook price differential on a global scale (which the article did) but with the textbook market in general.
</disclaimer>


<apology>
I understand that some/most textbooks are more expensive than they should be, and I do my fair share of complaining about textbook prices, but really, there's a reason for a good portion of the high prices.


If I publish a popular fiction novel (a la Tom Clancy, et al), I can expect to sell millions of copies and recoup the publishing cost for a low sale price. But if I'm publishing a new Group Theory math textbook, I'm probably lucky if I can sell into 6 digits. I'll probably be stuck at tens of thousands of copies. Even if I do make it into hundreds of thousands, we're still off by a factor of at least ten in sales volume. Not all of the publishing cost is linear in number of copies produced, and there's a portion, probably large, which is independent of the volume sold. So in order to recoup the publishing cost, the sales price has to go up. Maybe not by a factor of 10-100, but we can see why a small audience math text book costs 8 times as much as the latest Tom Clancy novel.
</apology>


<rant>
The problem with the whole textbook situation, IMO, is that the choice in which books to buy is taken from the consumer and placed in the hands of a third party, the professor. I have no problem paying $50 for "Design Patterns", because I *want* to buy it and I'm willing to pay that much. That's the way the market works -- you can charge whatever people are willing to pay. But when I'm *told* what book to buy, and have no *choice* but to do so (because, as in the instance of my brother's American Heritage class, it contains worksheets that must be turned in in class and *cannot* be photocopies), then I don't even *like* it, I have a problem. The market's not working because the publisher doesn't set the price based on what he expects consumers will pay, but based on what he expects professors to tolerate when they choose which books to force on their students. This is invariably higher. The choice of the actual consumer, which should include the choice not to buy, has been removed from the equation.
</rant>


Jacob Fugal


____________________
BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________
List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

Reply via email to