I'm all for it, as long as ``Linux'' is somewhere in the new list name. ;-)
And we must formalize top-posting as the only acceptable form of responding to a message on the newly formed list. Of course, I'm technically in the domain of the Austin Linux Users Group now, so I suppose there isn't much I can say about all this. And things are interesting enough 'round these parts. Ever heard of Joe Barr? On second thought, I can start cross-posting to the PLUG, the UUG, the SLLUG, the LDSOSSG, *and* the ALG! Whoo-hoo! <starts building new entries in his .mail_aliases> Oh, and just so Wade doesn't get this message: emacs Be good or have fun, Mike On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 03:09:21PM -0700, Stuart Jansen wrote: > What I would like to know is: how does everyone feel about just merging > the lists. No more of this cross-posting silliness. There will be some > BYUSA related stickiness we'll have to work out, but that can be left to > the officers to deal with. > > I suggest a period of open debate, followed by a highly scientific poll > on http://uug.byu.edu > > I, for one, am 100% in favor. (Don't worry me fellow BYU students, we > won't have to see their heathen beards through email, and nothing more > controversial than that has ever been seen on the Plug list.) .___________________________________________________________________. Michael A. Halcrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Security Software Engineer, IBM Linux Technology Center GnuPG Fingerprint: 05B5 08A8 713A 64C1 D35D 2371 2D3C FDDA 3EB6 601D Tis man's perdition to be safe, when for the truth he ought to die.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
