Michael Halcrow wrote:

On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:03:01PM -0700, Daniel Crookston wrote:

Why?  They're 100% correct.  The average consumer doesn't want to have to
deal with all of the stuff that Linux makes you deal with.  The average
consumer shouldn't *have* to deal with everything Linux makes you deal with.
They want something that's easy and quick and will have all the bells and
whistles that Windows has.  Installing Linux on a computer that you use to
surf and chat and email is like buying an SUV to go to the grocery store and
drive the kids to soccer.


Why?  They're 100% correct.  The average consumer doesn't want to have to
deal with all of the stuff that Windows makes you deal with.  The average
consumer shouldn't *have* to deal with everything Windows makes you deal with.
They want something that's easy and quick and will have all the bells and
whistles that Linux has.  Installing Windows on a computer that you use to
surf and chat and email is like buying an SUV to go to the grocery store and
drive the kids to soccer.

Given the choice between my Neon and any SUV I'd take the SUV. So now I'm confused. Which one is the SUV? Seriously.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

____________________
BYU Unix Users Group 
http://uug.byu.edu/ 
___________________________________________________________________
List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

Reply via email to