On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 15:01, Jacob Fugal wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> [Note: If misread, this post may sound angry. It's not. It's sarcastic
> and trying to make a point. Nothing more.]
> 
> Bryan Murdock wrote:
> | Just send me the patch to make evolution still reply only to the list
> | at the click of a button and I'll won't complain.
> 
> Just send me the patch to make everything else, and probably evolution
> too, automagically determine the original sender's preferred reply-to
> address (which may not coincide with the from address) and still reply
> only to that at the click of a button and I'll won't complain.

LOL.  Actually it's no skin off my back to hit reply-to and let the
person I'm replying to get a couple copies of the email (unless the RIAA
objects to the copying that is), so that's probably what I will do.  

> Jacob Fugal
> 
> [Note #2: This message was accidentally sent to just Bryan at first. So
> yes, I understand your frustration. I still stick with my stand however.
> What if it had been an angry post meant just for Bryan, and went to all
> the list?]

Then you might have learned not to be so emotional and inflammitory the
hard way, but you would have learned your lesson :P

Bryan

P.S. OK, I'm really going to ignore the UUG for the rest of the day and
try and get some real work done.  Really I am.


____________________
BYU Unix Users Group 
http://uug.byu.edu/ 
___________________________________________________________________
List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

Reply via email to