I was referring to Wikis in general.

Although as things go, you always have to be pretty cautions with ANY info you pull of 
the Internet.  I had a class once were the professor used several official looking 
documentary sites that were completely corrupt and wrong in their information.  Which 
is also why most of my professors try an limit any Internet obtained information that 
we can use for research reports.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alex Esplin
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 2:49 PM
To: BYU Unix Users Group
Subject: RE: [uug] Edit the Book of Mormon


I don't know how much "fun" I would want to have with
the Book of Mormon in this context, in that you never
know who is going to be reading it and who is going to
be getting wrong ideas from the "fun" that happens to
the most correct of any book on earth.  Regardless of
the fact that everything that is bogus can be
reverted, this seems to be an ideal opportunity for
those who are not particularly friendly with the
Church to gain some easy ammo.
--- Kenneth Burgener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Or simply revert everything, meaning the text NEVER
> gets 
> changed, and the wiki becomes useless/no fun.
> 



____________________
BYU Unix Users Group
http://uug.byu.edu/
___________________________________________________________________
List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

Reply via email to