On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 03:35:07PM -0700, Andrew McNabb wrote: > > Git works fine with committing to centralized repositories, and it still > provides advantages over tools like CVS and Subversion.
Sorry to keep responding to myself, but I thought that the following was a great little analogy: "A popular misconception is that distributed systems are ill-suited for projects requiring an official central repository (see for example this blog post). Nothing could be further from the truth. Photographing someone does not cause their soul to be stolen. Similarly, cloning the master repository does not make its importance diminish." from http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~blynn/gitmagic/ch01.html -- Andrew McNabb http://www.mcnabbs.org/andrew/ PGP Fingerprint: 8A17 B57C 6879 1863 DE55 8012 AB4D 6098 8826 6868
pgpAYbr0DNW9O.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
