Andrew McNabb wrote: > On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 03:35:07PM -0700, Andrew McNabb wrote: >> Git works fine with committing to centralized repositories, and it still >> provides advantages over tools like CVS and Subversion. > > Sorry to keep responding to myself, but I thought that the following was > a great little analogy: > > "A popular misconception is that distributed systems are ill-suited for > projects requiring an official central repository (see for example this > blog post). Nothing could be further from the truth. Photographing > someone does not cause their soul to be stolen. Similarly, cloning the > master repository does not make its importance diminish." > > from http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~blynn/gitmagic/ch01.html >
This came up on kernel trap today, though some of you who had questions about git and windows might find it informative: http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Git_on_Windows -- Jonathan Wilson PGP Fingerprint: 41FE 5428 D367 27D5 4759 4C31 D0C9 CB32 BA03 2417 -------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
