You don't have to use Google to setup a Wave. The code is open source (or is supposed to be) so we could in theory setup our own implementation of Wave.
On 11/24/09, Matthew Gardner <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 8:07 AM, James Carroll <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think that wave has great potential, but is a little half baked at the >> moment, I have a wave account, but think its not worth the effort just to >> include the group in a wave. >> > > I would have to agree with James that it's not as exciting as the video > makes it seem just yet. Though I agree with AJ that it has a lot of > potential for group discussions, and it does threading pretty well. The > problem is moving everyone over to wave, which certainly isn't going to > happen for a long time, if it ever does. If people decide to make a UUG > wave group, I would be fine with that, though I'm pretty much ambivalent at > this point. > > On a related note, for the last two meetings we have said, "the first 25 > people to show up will get wave invites." Well, I still have 90. So, I'll > just leave this as a standing offer until I get low - if any of you want to > try out wave, or have friends that want to try out wave, and want an invite > or two or three, send me an email off list. And the invites don't show up > immediately - I've seen them come in as few as 2 days, but sometimes it > takes over a week. It just depends on when Google decides to add people. > -- Devin Flake 801-368-5595 [email protected] www.devinflake.com flake.homelinux.net -------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info (unsubscribe here): http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
