On 3/16/2010 2:20 PM, Andrew McNabb wrote: > You mean that Debian packagers should be using /usr/lib wheneven I think > libexec is valid, right? :) >
Yes. If a Debian package uses libexec, a bug will be filed against it. If you want to personally install libexec on your system, eat your heart out. Debian doesn't care what you do to your system. They only care what /they/ do to your system. > By the way, as far as I can tell, libexec originally comes from BSD, not > from Redhat. > I guess it's more frustrating that Red Hat documents it as an FHS, when it isn't, regardless of who it came from. Maybe that should be filed as a bug against their documentation. -- . O . O . O . . O O . . . O . . . O . O O O . O . O O . . O O O O . O . . O O O O . O O O
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info (unsubscribe here): http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
