On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 04:55:12PM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> 
> Yes. If a Debian package uses libexec, a bug will be filed against it.
> If you want to personally install libexec on your system, eat your heart
> out. Debian doesn't care what you do to your system. They only care what
> /they/ do to your system.

Seeing as I'm not a Debian user, I care a lot about anything /they/ do
to my system. :)


> I guess it's more frustrating that Red Hat documents it as an FHS, when
> it isn't, regardless of who it came from. Maybe that should be filed as
> a bug against their documentation.

I've googled around a bit, and it looks like there are some very strong
emotions in the Debian camp about libexec.  I think it's because
Debian-based systems are the only ones without libexec, so they have to
put a lot of work into ripping it out of hundreds of different programs.
I've seen references saying that libexec has been considered several
times for inclusion in FHS, and the main reason it hasn't happened is
that it's such an emotional issue.

The fact of the matter is that libexec has been around on many different
types of systems for many years.  I find it hard to believe that there's
some vast conspiracy to undermine the FHS by creating renegade libexec
directories in /usr.  It seems much more likely that a lot of people
think libexec is a good idea, and FHS is just a little behind.

In the end, it's really not a big deal.  I've seen weak arguments for
libexec and weak arguments against it.  I guess if people need to fight
about something, it's best that they pick an inconsequential issue like
this. :)


-- 
Andrew McNabb
http://www.mcnabbs.org/andrew/
PGP Fingerprint: 8A17 B57C 6879 1863 DE55  8012 AB4D 6098 8826 6868
--------------------
BYU Unix Users Group 
http://uug.byu.edu/ 

The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their
author.  They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. 
___________________________________________________________________
List Info (unsubscribe here): http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list

Reply via email to