On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Aaron Toponce <[email protected]>wrote:
> I guess it's more frustrating that Red Hat documents it as an FHS, when it > isn't, regardless of who it came from. Maybe that should be filed as a bug > against their documentation. > I didn't really have any idea of what you were talking about (and still don't have a really good idea), but you got me interested, so I went at looked at FHS 2.3. It talks about an optional /usr/lib<qual> - does that include /usr/libexec?
-------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info (unsubscribe here): http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
