On 4/20/10 1:53 PM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Stuart Jansen <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 13:37 -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> Well for me, it's nano.
I'm sure it took a lot of courage to admit that in public.
Unfortunately, we're still going to have to shun you now.
I didn't say it was a useful contribution. Not sure how useful I am to
discussions on this list anyway! :P
I'll go back to my corner now.
Robert LeBlanc
Life Sciences & Undergraduate Education Computer Support
Brigham Young University
It's okay, Robert. I use nano sometimes too. Especially when I'm using
some kind of revision control, and it automatically comes up with
something to annotate the commit. Sometimes I'll go through the trouble
of updating EDITOR/VISUAL env. variables, but a lot of the time, I just
don't care enough.
Of course the revision control is usually either CVS or SVN, depending
on the project, but that's a completely different "discussion". Again,
it's a matter of works-well-enough-for-my-purposes coupled with
don't-really-care-enough and have-other-priorities-right-now.
--
Lloyd Brown
Systems Administrator
Fulton Supercomputing Lab
Brigham Young University
http://marylou.byu.edu
--------------------
BYU Unix Users Group
http://uug.byu.edu/
The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their
author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG.
___________________________________________________________________
List Info (unsubscribe here): http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
