Although we are not filthy rich, we could probably put aside a couple K for http2 support if someone wanted to work on it. And yes, an invoice from unbit would be more than enough for us.
Mathieu Le ven. 19 oct. 2018 à 08:25, zd nex <zdnex...@gmail.com> a écrit : > So I guess result is that there is probably more users which will be > interested and some of them can try to make some funding for this job. So > next question is how much time it can take and how much funding this > project can require? I am not sure about crowdfunding services as they tend > to require more time so I guess just simple donations or invoices from > Unbit can with work easier way. > > Btw I think there is quite a lot of users which use https/http or fast > routers as they are much simpler to setup if you already have uwsgi > installed. > > st 17. 10. 2018 v 20:44 odesílatel Aleks <al-uw...@none.at> napsal: > >> Hi. >> >> Am 17.10.2018 um 16:13 schrieb Roberto De Ioris: >> > >> >> Hello guys, >> >> >> >> I would like to initiate again discussion about supporting HTTP2 >> router as >> >> SPDY cannot be used and HTTP2 is missing. I guess there was previously >> >> some >> >> talk about this, but I think there was lack of interest. >> >> >> >> If there will be more interest > we were thinking, we could ask >> developers >> >> to restart work on this and if we could also try to make some funding >> >> project for this. >> >> >> >> Reason, why we want this is that having NGINX makes our stack more >> >> complicated and I really do not like that for each feature I need >> another >> >> service. >> >> >> >> Also this could make uWSGI more interesting option again and make it >> more >> >> promising for users. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> Zdenek >> >> Web: www.pripravto.cz >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> > >> > Hi, yes the SPDY code is basically useless (note to me and Riccardo: >> time >> > to remove it ;), and i constantly underestimate how many users runs the >> > http/fast routers. HTTP/2 (albeit based on SPDY) is pretty different, >> and >> > implementing it in a solid way would require lot of manpower. If some >> > company want to sponsor its development (like Lincoln Loop with the >> > pyuwsgi stuff) can drop a mail to i...@unbit.it. >> >> As I followed the nginx H2 implementation and follow the haproxy H2 >> implementation I can fully agree that this isn't a easy task. >> >> Even the h2 implementation of the two popular servers there are still >> some bugs >> based on client behavior. Maybe it helps to learn from the current >> implementations for the own implementation. >> >> http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git;a=blob;f=src/h2.c;hb=HEAD >> http://hg.nginx.org/nginx/file/tip/src/http/v2 >> >> There is also a "new" player in the h2 game called h2o >> >> https://h2o.examp1e.net/ >> https://github.com/h2o/h2o/tree/master/lib/http2 >> >> As I plan to move to uwsgi for php to get rid of php-fpm I would also >> prefer >> that uwsgi have the HTTP2 feature. >> >> @Roberto: Do you have any Idea about time and money to add this feature >> in the >> uwsgi? >> >> > Just as a side note, all of the new features (or massive refactoring) of >> > the uWSGI code in the last 3 years have been sponsored by various >> > companies while Unbit simply manages commercial support. This is why the >> > release cycle slowed down. >> > >> > Personally my focus now (with now > 1 year :) is on asyncio (it is not a >> > mistery i have never been a fan of the WSGI standard), but i am still >> not >> > sure a cooperation with asyncio and uWSGI can be made without heavily >> > refactoring uWSGI itself. >> > >> > Thanks >> >> Best regards >> Aleks >> _______________________________________________ >> uWSGI mailing list >> uWSGI@lists.unbit.it >> http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi >> > > _______________________________________________ > uWSGI mailing list > uWSGI@lists.unbit.it > http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi > -- Mathieu Lacage <mathieu.lac...@alcmeon.com>
_______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list uWSGI@lists.unbit.it http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
