On 2014/02/17 13:45:46, rmcilroy wrote:
Do any other V8 team members have an opinion?
Only what Jacob's already stated. We decided this early in the A64 port, as
we'd
frequently want to merge Pops, but the merging often brought bugs due to
Pop(a);
Pop(b) != Pop(a, b).
The only other reason I have is in a sequence such as:
Pop(a, b)
Pop(c, d)
The current scheme pops a, b, c then d. The old scheme pops b, a, d then c,
which I think is more confusing; it obeys reading order, but only in one
direction.
https://codereview.chromium.org/169533002/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
