Andre "Osku" Schmidt wrote: > so it seems: > "FooBar" is "foo_bar_"
> and "foo_bar" is "foo_bar_" > but what happens with "Foo_Bar" ? ;P > (yes, it seems to follow this logic, it's "foo__bar_") Yes, but these are uncommon class names anyway. If unsure one can always look at the generated C code. > and it seems i don't need that connect_signals method neither (as > opposite to the glade example, where i copied and modified it from), > yuhuu! Yes, connect_signal_full is only needed if you want to customize the signal connection process. But usually you don't need that. > now i got a related question (as noob). what is mostly used for own > signal handlers, inside or outside of my class ? i assume (with my > little knowledge) the major difference would be scope-of-variables ? > > (i propably just use outside for starters, as then i dont have to write > the class name in the gtkbuilder ui file ;P) For small programs you can put them into the global namespace. But if you have many callbacks you will end up with a polluted global namespace. So you might want to organize them in classes. And for non-trivial callback methods, if you wish to access instance methods in order to modify the state of the surrounding object, the callbacks must be instance methods. > cheers > Andre > > ps. and 1000x thanks for the added examples in gnome.org! You're welcome! > > _______________________________________________ > Vala-list mailing list > Vala-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list > Regards, Frederik _______________________________________________ Vala-list mailing list Vala-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
