> alternatively we could encode "%t" as "%.s". this is an apparently > non-sensical construct (print zero characters of the string) that we could > overload with this meaning.
I prefer that; doing a lot of xml_quote everywhere is hassle. gcc will not complain about "%.s" ? At the end of this it would be good to put in a comment somewhere, a short description of the nonstandard format extensions we now support. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Valgrind-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers
