On Friday, 5. October 2007, Dirk Mueller wrote: > sure, I'm more wondering what to do with "%t". in valgrind ,this is an > XML-escaped "%s", while for printf its a length modifier, which causes > quite some warnings. > > do we aim for thread safety? otherwise a xml_quote() around the argument > sounds like the easiest solution for me.
alternatively we could encode "%t" as "%.s". this is an apparently non-sensical construct (print zero characters of the string) that we could overload with this meaning. Dirk ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Valgrind-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/valgrind-developers
