> First I want to say that I'm impressed with the completeness of your > testing, Every protocol like this leaves something out, but you > covered the basics well. > > Thanks.
> My current biggest beef with virtualbox is networking. > > Different guests have problems working with the various network > adapter simulations, and there is no pattern that Ive been able to > discover about what that really means. > > So far the version of virtualbox, the host os, the guest os, and the > network connection type (NAT, Host Only, etc.) are all factors in > determining which network adapter model emulation to work. > > Let's start with basic home use case: NAT network, pcNET-III NIC for 32-bit guests, Intel PRO 1000 MT Desktop NIC for 64-bit guests. (default for VBox) Workload: browsing to web sites (HTTP), like google.com or intel.com or ping them (ICMP) Which failures you had in this basic use case? (as you see in my document, I had no issues at all for this simple use case) My tip: once you have a problem write it down, and try to revert to default NIC for this type of guest and try to simplify workload. (and revert to NAT) -- -Alexey Eromenko "Technologov"
_______________________________________________ vbox-users mailing list [email protected] http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
