dude get a fucking hint, WE DONT CARE ABOUT THIS BS IN THE PUBLIC FORUM! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul L. Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 11:47 AM Subject: [vchkpw] Re: Tom's fork of vpopmail (and qmailadmin)
> > Hello Rick > > Rick Macdougall writes: > > > I think Tom and Ken have resolved their issues off list > > So it appears. Ken has not resolved my issue with his involvement with > vpopmail. > > > and we > > We??? Do you claim to speak for everyone on the list? Surely not > because at best you can speak for everyone on the list EXCEPT me. > And I suspect there may be one or two others you do not speak for > either. > > > would appreciate it if you did the same. > > Gosh, wouldn't it have been a good idea if you wanted to avoid > unnecessary traffic on the list if you had mailed me DIRECTLY instead > of posting to the list? If you want to make your point ON the list then > you have to allow me to respond there. Well, whether you allow me or > not, that's what I'm gonna do. > > If you want to discuss this by mail then feel free to take it there. If > you want to rebuke me on the list, however nicely, then expect me to > respond there. As I explained to somebody else today, all you get to > control is what you read and write and where you post it. You do not get > to control what I read and write and where I post that. Any attempt to > claim the moral high ground about unnecessary traffic to the list which > is POSTED TO THE LIST will get the rebuke it deserves ON the list. > > > If Tom or Ken has an issue, it may belong on the list, if you personally > > have an issue with Inter7 and/or Tom it does not. > > I disagree with your statement, for which you have provided no backing. > If I disagree with Ken being an admin and can provide a compelling > argument for my belief then that DOES belong on the list. I believe I > have provided grounds why Ken is not a suitable choice for an admin. > Perhaps you would care to provide some reasoning, however slender, why > I should not take issue with Ken here. > > > Thank you in advance for your understanding. > > You are ever the optimist... > > -- > Paul Allen > Softflare Support > > >
