> ok so we're both right and we're both wrong. > > the patch functionality itself does not require the qmail-toaster patch, > however, since the patch file itself was created against the > qmail-toaster patch, it requires it to be cleanly patched without manual > intervention. So, if you don't want to do any work, then I guess it > requires the toaster patch. > > Perhaps he should make a patch against stock qmail so those of us who > don't want to use his 'toaster' patch can use it anyways. > > -Jeremy
Or he should at least say somewhere on his site that the chkuser patch requires the toaster. At least then I would have ignored it instead of trying to get it to work against vanilla qmail :) -Russell
