"Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'm with Geir. What does dormancy have to do with it? Dormancy is
>> the opposite of our plans.
>Martin brought it up as a worry for Velocity moving to TLP.
>"My main concern here is that when no external projects join, will the
>project move into dormant state ?"
>So my view is that I'd rather see a dormant velocity.apache, than a
>dormant jakarta-velocity - if I had to see one of the two that is.
Hi,
as I said before, I do want to distinguish between "dormant" and "stable". Just
because Velocity does not apply any patch that comes floating around and
releases every other week, doesn't mean, that the project is dormant. We, as
developers, are just picky what should go in and what not. :-)
Yes, I agree, 1.5 already took to long. :-)
Best regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development
Social behaviour: Bavarians can be extremely egalitarian and folksy.
-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bavaria
Most Franconians do not like to be called Bavarians.
-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franconia
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
