Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
"Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm with Geir. What does dormancy have to do with it? Dormancy is
the opposite of our plans.
Martin brought it up as a worry for Velocity moving to TLP.
"My main concern here is that when no external projects join, will the
project move into dormant state ?"
So my view is that I'd rather see a dormant velocity.apache, than a
dormant jakarta-velocity - if I had to see one of the two that is.
Hi,
as I said before, I do want to distinguish between "dormant" and "stable". Just
because Velocity does not apply any patch that comes floating around and
releases every other week, doesn't mean, that the project is dormant. We, as
developers, are just picky what should go in and what not. :-)
With dormant in this case I mean that there is not high activity anymore (from a dev perspective
that is). The problem with the words stable/mature is that it doesn't necessarily make a statement
about the activity.
Mvgr,
Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
