I have some interest in this topic. We are running a fairly simple, fresh, 6.5.2 install with one RHEL4 Master and one RHEL4 Media server. Things are going relatively smoothly.
But we are looking at moving our first Windows Media Server over from the old 5.1 world to the new 6.5.2 environment. This Media Sever looks after backups for an Exchange cluster and Enterprise Vault for Exchange. 6.5.2 is pretty stable for us in a Linux only environment. But what do others think about introducing a W2K3 Media Server into the mix? 6.5.2? 6.5.1? Any thoughts appreciated. Keep in mind this will only be a Media Server. The Master is still Linux and so far has been pretty stable (apart from a few problems that can't really be blamed on Netbackup itself). Thanks, Dean On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Mark Glazerman < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We're running 6.5.1 on a Solaris x86 master and apart from a ZFS issue > (which was fixed with engineering binaries) we don't have any ongoing > problems. 6.5.2 and 6.5.2a seem to be releases that fixe lots of issues > for some and create additional problems for others. > > > > Mark J > > > > *Mark Glazerman* > > Desk: 314-889-8282 > > Cell: 618-520-3401 > > P please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to > > > > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Ed Wilts > *Sent:* Thursday, August 21, 2008 6:46 AM > *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Cc:* veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > *Subject:* Re: [Veritas-bu] Most recent stable release? > > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 6:04 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Watch out for this one with 6.5.1 on Windows: > > http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/301175.htm > > > The technote says that this is fixed in 6.5.2. > > > > Right now I'm caught between that one and the completely broken 6.5.2A - > http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/305609.htm > > > The technote says that there's an EEB available for this. 6.5.2A is *NOT > completely broken. Many years, us included, are running it in full > production. > > > > You'd think they'd test this stuff before release by ,say, trying to run a > backup or something... > > > This has been discussed before. Your comment is unwarranted and low shots > like this don't encourage Symantec employees or other users to help you. > > .../Ed > > Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _______________________________________________ > Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu > http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu > >
_______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
