On 11 Oct, 2006, at 12:45, Sue Atkinson/Ed Engelman wrote:
I do not see how you can call the man-made additions of carbon
dioxide and other greenhouse gasses insignificant.
Check www.junkscience.com
A preponderance of climate scientists agree that civilization is
the major cause of global warming.
A preponderance of climate scientists agree that unless they can get
this message across, they will lose funding...
BTW, there are many climate scientists that do not agree that
civilization is the major cause of global warming.
Ice core studies have demonstrated that greenhouse gasses have not
been higher for more than 10,000 years.
But greenhouse gases contribute only a small amount to the warming
effect. Again, see www.junkscience.com
To call it junk science insults my intelligence. "Junk science" is
just a cry to quell honest discussion. Most "Junk science" web
sites ignore major trends and compare "apples to oranges".
Please take a good look at www.junkscience.com.
We have seen many extreme weather events in the last few years that
are exacerbated by warm water temperatures that fuel stronger
hurricanes and rain storms.
Correct. Never did I say that there was no trend in the current climate.
I am disappointed that a discussion by those who enjoy fishing in
clear, cool water would be so quick to aid their destruction by
ignoring the avalanche of scientific evidence.
Which there is not... And don't get me wrong, I am in favour of
fishing in clear, cool water, and I am not saying that all is right
with this planet. However, many environmentalist's agenda's are as
antiscientific and antisocietal as e.g. PeTA.
Henk
=============================== ><(((((º>
===============================
| Dr. Henk J.M. Verhaar | e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Ecotoxicoloog en vliegbinder | tel: 035 656
2128 |
| Stichts End 17 | mobiel: 06 26
136034 |
| NL-1244 PK Ankeveen | web: www.xs4all.nl/
~flyrod |
=============================== <º)))))><
===============================
