> Adam Roach <[email protected]> wrote: > I propose clarifying by changing the first milestone to be "Requirements and > evaluation criteria to IESG..."
Works for me. Also fine to keep the final milestone for the testing doc for now. We can revisit once there, which also gives time to see how opus handles this (currently no supply or demand interest). Mo _______________________________________________ video-codec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec
