Mo Zanaty (mzanaty) wrote:
Adam Roach <[email protected]> wrote:
I propose clarifying by changing the first milestone to be "Requirements and
evaluation criteria to IESG..."
Works for me.
Also fine to keep the final milestone for the testing doc for now. We can
revisit once there, which also gives time to see how opus handles this
(currently no supply or demand interest).
Both sound fine to me.
Any objection to adding the deliverable for a reference implementation?
Here's some proposed text:
"3. Source code for a reference implementation that includes both an
encoder and a decoder."
_______________________________________________
video-codec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec
