On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 09:09:22PM -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I had previously understood that V4L2, perhaps with some modifications,
> > would replace V4L. What changed?
>
> o Lots of people want to keep the existing API as the basis
> o The Buz folks did a really nice codec API
> o Stephen Tweedie got rid of all the existing constraints of DMA to
> user space
>
> > Is there any roadmap for V4L, or indication of what new features will be
> > included in it?
>
In particular, will it have the video frame timestamping feature of v4l2 so
I can capture video and sound with accurate audio sync?
--
Brian Ristuccia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
