Re: [V4L] frame buffer

[Ben Bridgwater]

Gerd Knorr wrote:

> > 2) Propose a cleaner ioctl to Alan, and see if he will accept it.
>
> VIDIOCSMBUF(struct video_mbuf)?  Just an idea ...

I like it - clean and logical.

Then any driver that has implemented the SWIN/GMBUF restriction (are there
any?) just needs to switch to the implicitly defaulted SMBUF semantics.

If this was added but not all drivers supported the ioctl, then presumably the
app. just gets an error on the call?

Ben




_______________________________________________
Video4linux-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list