Hi Paul, >Pal has a frames per second rate of 25 where as ntsc has 29.7, which >in real terms means you get slightly better video reproduction on >ntsc
While I'd ordinarily jump in and correct you here, you say you were a TV tech, so you should probably correct yourself. :-) While NTSC has a higher frame rate, PAL has a higher scan line count and more accurate colour reproduction, so it is just plain wrong to say that "you get slightly better video reproducion on NTSC". Considering cinematic film runs at 24 frames per second, the 25 of PAL is not an issue, and I'd suggest if anything, that the colour and resolution make NTSC the slightly inferior format of the two for quality of "video reproduction". I leave it to you to clarify this for us in more detail. Having experienced a lot of both PAL and NTSC, I know which I definitely prefer to watch. Hint: It isn't Never The Same Colour. Regards, Richard ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
