- Andreas
On Wed, 24 May 2006 22:09:26 +0200, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would think the more restrictive includes both: by-nc-sa.
>
> -- Enric
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Haugstrup"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 24 May 2006 21:11:33 +0200, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Why can't by-sa be mixed with nc-sa?
>>
>> Because the first stipulates that any new works must be released
> under a
>> by-sa license while the second stipulates that the new work must be
>> released under a nc-sa license.
>>
>> As the CC page says: "Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build
> upon
>> this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a license
>> identical to this one."
>>
>> If I choose to release my new work under a by-sa license I will be
>> violating the second person's license. If I choose a nc-sa license I
> will
>> be violating the first person's license.
>>
>> And that's why I don't like Share-Alike licenses. They make remixing
> hard
>> and/or impossible.
>>
>> --
>> Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
>> <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
>> Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
<URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
SPONSORED LINKS
| Fireant | Individual | Typepad |
| Use | Explains |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
