distribute the resulting work *only* under a license identical to this
one" is unclear to you (emphasis mine)?
And from the legal code:
"You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly
digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this License,
a later version of this License with the same License Elements as this
License, or a Creative Commons iCommons license that contains the same
License Elements as this License (e.g. Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 Japan)."
It is quite clear. If you use materiale from a Share-Alike work (apart
from Fair Use), you *must* release your work under the exact same license.
I've been telling you it's stupid, but that's how it is.
- Andreas
On Wed, 24 May 2006 22:35:03 +0200, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Though it doesn't look like it "should".
>
> - Enric
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Haugstrup"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> No, it must be the *same* license.
>>
>> - Andreas
>>
>> On Wed, 24 May 2006 22:09:26 +0200, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > I would think the more restrictive includes both: by-nc-sa.
>> >
>> > -- Enric
>> >
>> > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Haugstrup"
>> > <solitude@> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, 24 May 2006 21:11:33 +0200, Enric <enric@> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Why can't by-sa be mixed with nc-sa?
>> >>
>> >> Because the first stipulates that any new works must be released
>> > under a
>> >> by-sa license while the second stipulates that the new work must be
>> >> released under a nc-sa license.
>> >>
>> >> As the CC page says: "Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build
>> > upon
>> >> this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a license
>> >> identical to this one."
>> >>
>> >> If I choose to release my new work under a by-sa license I will be
>> >> violating the second person's license. If I choose a nc-sa license I
>> > will
>> >> be violating the first person's license.
>> >>
>> >> And that's why I don't like Share-Alike licenses. They make remixing
>> > hard
>> >> and/or impossible.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
>> >> <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
>> >> Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
>> <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
>> Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
<URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
SPONSORED LINKS
| Fireant | Individual | Typepad |
| Use | Explains |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
