Good work. I say don't mark it vandalism. Don't give him the satisfaction of getting into long discussions, either - perhaps he's been loving the attention he's been getting from Meiser, and we need to make it boring for him.
Rupert On 30 Apr 2007, at 18:37, David Meade wrote: > found it ... if we undo his undo should we mark it as "Vandalism" > (defined as "change of content made in a deliberate attempt to > compromise the integrity of Wikipedia") ... or what? > > On 4/30/07, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > wow he's already undone it all ... > > > > how does one undo his undo? (I'm all signed up and ready to fight > the > > good fight) :-) > > > > - Dave > > > > On 4/29/07, Jan McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Has rather been decimated. > > > > > > Wow. > > > > > > Anybody? > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlog > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > -- > > > The Faux Press - better than real > > > http://fauxpress.blogspot.com > > > http://twitter.com/fauxpress > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.DavidMeade.com > > > > -- > http://www.DavidMeade.com > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
