I'm less worried about my own costs going up than I am about the shrinking of my potential audience, since a lot of people won't necessarily be willing to pay what I'm willing to pay for access. That will mean a lot more people tiptoeing around the internet, afraid to sample a lot of indie video content for fear they'll be hit with a penalty charge or their access will be cut off.
Chris --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "David Meade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think I'm ok with this so long as where I'm downloading the video > *from* does NOT matter in anyway. > > For example, if I download video from blip.tv, it should cost the same > amount per bit as video from CNN.com. > > Now, granted I don't WANT to have to pay more for video downloads ... > but as long as all creators/hosters of the content cost the consumer > the same thing ... I think it's justifiable to price on consumption. > (Of course the consumers aren't going to go for it unless its very > reasonable, or every other ISP out there bands together in price > fixing) > > A slippery slope though, perhaps, in regard to net neutrality - should > be watched. > > - Dave
