hahah of course i'm like oh cool there's a boondocks movie ie http://www.boondockstv.com/
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Sull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.boondockfans.com > > > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Rupert <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]<rupert%40fatgirlinohio.org>> > wrote: > > > No, obviously it's not a bad thing if a director just doesn't want to > > do it. Nobody's forcing anyone. My point - and maybe it was badly > > made - is that so many other people in unexpected places are using > > online video to promote ongoing projects... it seems absurd to me > > that filmmakers aren't at the forefront of that phenomenon. And > > they're not. Quite the opposite. And yet how many of these feature > > films will have a "Making of" movie being shot expensively for the > > DVD (or, in past times, for a momentary cable broadcast)? > > > > > > On 5-Sep-08, at 4:25 PM, schlomo rabinowitz wrote: > > > > I don't think its exactly Negative if a director doesnt want to blog his > > activites or post dailies onto the web. Maybe the director just wants to > > show a finished product; many people are like that. > > Kent, you're making a movie (Attack of the Killer Tomatoes!!!), do > > feel the > > need to blog the production process? I assume you guys have talked to > > the > > producer about this sort of stuff. Is there anything you can share about > > that? > > > > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Rupert <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]<rupert%40fatgirlinohio.org> > <rupert%40fatgirlinohio.org>> > > > wrote: > > > > > I mean, REALLY - it's now 4-5 years since the people on this list > > > started mucking about with this stuff. > > > > > > And Jan's director is unusual in his use of social media and video to > > > document the production of his independent movie?? > > > > > > Even politicians are now well-versed in using videoblogging and all > > > kinds of web video to sell their message as they go along. > > > http://johnmccain.blip.tv/ > > > > > > The Queen has her own YouTube channel, for god's sake. And it's > > > quite good. > > > http://www.youtube.com/user/TheRoyalChannel > > > > > > When John McCain and Elizabeth II are more innovative in their use of > > > online video than professional moviemakers, you know something is > > > seriously rotten in the state of Denmark. > > > > > > I edited out a lot of swear words from this post. > > > > > > Rupert > > > http://twittervlog.tv > > > > > > > > > On 5-Sep-08, at 4:05 PM, Rupert wrote: > > > > > > Good for Michael Moore. Yes, some of them are starting to get it. > > > But even the ones who are getting it are only partly getting it, and > > > - like your director, Jan - are bullied by producers and funders who > > > are still a long way from getting it. > > > > > > In May, I was at a talk about the future of documentaries given by > > > Deborah Scranton, who directed War Tapes. > > > > > > In the end, she advocated YouTube as the best way to get your films > > > seen by people. > > > > > > I asked her how she thought that kind of free distribution fitted > > > with getting the considerable funding needed to make big > > > documentaries like hers. > > > > > > She didn't have an answer. > > > > > > And then I asked her whether it was OK for The War Tapes to be > > > distributed on YouTube so that it got viewed by more people. > > > > > > She said "Oh, that's a question for the producer." > > > > > > I was really disappointed with her. One moment, she was saying "It's > > > great for you little people to get your films in front of an audience > > > on YouTube" - and the next, she wouldn't even give her personal view > > > about her own film being shown that way, to a room full of emerging > > > documentary filmmakers. > > > > > > These questions are no brainers to me, and yet she was supposed to be > > > giving an authoritative view about the future of documentaries. It's > > > all very easy for established filmmakers to say "Up and coming > > > filmmakers should use YouTube" - but if they say that, then they have > > > to be able to justify why THEY should use it, too - regardless of > > > what the studio's lawyers say in 2008. Otherwise it's just a > > > bullshit platitude to make them sound like they get it. And it > > > doesn't address the problem of how big documentaries will be funded > > > ten years from now. > > > > > > I'm always amazed at how long it takes TV and Film professionals to > > > understand and get excited about this stuff, instead of seeing it as > > > a financial threat. > > > > > > Rupert > > > http://twittervlog.tv > > > > > > On 5-Sep-08, at 3:29 PM, Jan McLaughlin wrote: > > > > > > Great news, really. > > > > > > They begin to 'get it'. > > > > > > Ha! > > > > > > Bwah-hahaha. > > > > > > Yes!!!!!!!!! > > > > > > The director of the indie movie I just finished mixing ("City > > > Island") is > > > putting clips from dailies (bloopers & such) online on his blog > > through > > > YouTube. > > > > > > < > > > http://moviestildawn.blogspot.com/2008/09/city-island-empire-diner- > > > moment.html > > > > > > > > > > The producers had him cease and desist for about a week during > > > production, > > > but blog comments convinced 'em it was the right thing to do. > > > > > > One producer at a time... > > > > > > The director also wants to break his previous movie ("Two Family > > House") > > > into 10-minute segments and put the whole thing on YouTube - and WILL > > > eventually. The director definitely gets it. > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Jay dedman > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <jay.dedman%40gmail.com> <jay.dedman%40gmail.com > ><jay.dedman%40gmail.com>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Michael Moore is putting out his new film, "Slacker Rising", on > > > the web > > > > through blip.tv (for free). > > > > > > > > http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080905-michael-moore-skips- > > > box-office-film-heads-straight-to-net.html > > > > > > > > "*Slacker Uprising* details Moore's tour of 62 US cities in an > > > attempt to > > > > rally young voters before the presidential election in 2004. Moore > > > says > > > > that > > > > he originally considered releasing the movie in theaters, as he > > > did with > > > > his > > > > 2004 film criticizing the Bush Administration, *Fahrenheit 9/11*. > > > However, > > > > he decided to go the online route instead as a symbol of gratitude > > > to his > > > > fans. "I thought it'd be a nice way to celebrate my 20th year of > > > doing > > > > this," Moore told the Associated > > > > Press<http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/latestnews/index.php? > > > id=12199>. > > > > "And also help get out the vote for November. I've been thinking > > > about what > > > > I want to do to help with the election this year." > > > > > > > > I know Michael Moore and Radiohead have built-in audiences, but it > > > is also > > > > getting people used to these new distribution models. > > > > > > > > Jay > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > http://jaydedman.com > > > > 917 371 6790 > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jan McLaughlin > > > Production Sound Mixer > > > air = 862-571-5334 > > > aim = janofsound > > > skype = janmclaughlin > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Schlomo Rabinowitz > > http://schlomolog.blogspot.com > > http://hatfactory.net > > AIM:schlomochat > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > -- http://geekentertainment.tv [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
