Many thanks - that saves me a trip to the British Library.

What you say does highlight a big problem ...there is so much inaccurate information in circulation.

We should all be careful we don't add to it!

Monica




----- Original Message ----- From: "Martyn Hodgson" <hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk> To: "Vihuela Dmth" <vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>; "Monica Hall" <mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:36 PM
Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: PS to ...Re: Guitarre theorbee - Berners book(let)



  My memory IS going! I DO have Berner's book.  My excuse is that I was
  thrown off the scent by it being called a book - it's actually a rather
  small paperbound booklet...

  Pagw 45 has the picture, but I'm afraid it's entitled 'Head of
  theorboed guitar, late eighteenth-century - attributed to Cosineau
  1780' (G. Thibault collection - Thibault was one of the authors of the
  booklet). In short, one of those instruments using overwound strings
  and many extant examples some pictured on the Harp-Guitar site
  previously mentioned.

  The page also has two other depictions of guitars: a four course and a
  5 course both taken from Mersenne.

  I wouldn't take Berners little work as at all reliable/accurate these
  days: even in 1967, when published, we knew that the chitarrone was not
  generally strung 'usually with metal',  and that Mersenne's depiction
  of what he called a theorbe was actually an archlute (as indeed M later
  said in an autograph emendation to his own copy) tho' Berners calls it
  a theorbo. Similarly, of the 5 course guitar he says the ' lower three
  courses double in octaves' ........

  Martyn

  --- On Wed, 22/7/09, Monica Hall <mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:

    From: Monica Hall <mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
    Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] PS to ...Re: Guitarre theorbee
    To: "Martyn Hodgson" <hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
    Cc: "Vihuelalist" <vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
    Date: Wednesday, 22 July, 2009, 7:58 AM

  Yes - Donald does say that it is late - presumably 18th century.
  The illustration Alexander has mentioned is beautiful but obviously a
  different instrument from either Gallot or Granata.
  Monica
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: "Martyn Hodgson" <[1]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
  To: "Vihuela Dmth" <[2]vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu>; "Monica Hall"
  <[3]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
  Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 7:08 AM
  Subject: [VIHUELA] PS to ...Re: Guitarre theorbee
  >
  >   PS to my last: the significance of this depiction hinges around how
  >   'late' it is. By the end of the 18thC there was the fashion for
  >   classically inspired guitars with two necks (after Kithara) and
  theorbo
  >   like extensions; they used overwound basses (as contemporary
  >   guitars). I see these as new inventions rather than development of
  the
  >   17thC Gth/Gat and thus telling us nothing about the stringing of
  the
  >   earlier instruments.
  >
  >   M
  >   --- On Wed, 22/7/09, Martyn Hodgson <[4]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
  wrote:
  >
  >     From: Martyn Hodgson <[5]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
  >     Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Guitarre theorbee
  >     To: "Monica Hall" <[6]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
  >     Date: Wednesday, 22 July, 2009, 7:02 AM
  >
  >
  >   Me neither. But I see Donald from time to time so will ask him
  about it
  >   in due course.
  >
  >   Martyn
  >   --- On Tue, 21/7/09, Monica Hall <[7]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
  >
  >     From: Monica Hall <[8]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
  >     Subject: [VIHUELA] Guitarre theorbee
  >     To: "Vihuelalist" <[9]vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu>
  >     Date: Tuesday, 21 July, 2009, 10:20 PM
  >
  >      I see that Donald Gill says that there is a drawing of the neck
  and
  >      pegbox of a late example of a theorboed guitar in the G.
  Thibault
  >      collection reproduced in a book by A. Berners "Preservation and
  >      resoration of musical instruments".
  >      Has anyone seen this?  It's in the BL but I can't get there this
  >   week.
  >      Martyn?
  >      Monica
  >
  __________________________________________________________________
  >      I am using the Free version of [1]SPAMfighter.
  >      We are a community of 6 million users fighting spam.
  >      SPAMfighter has removed 4 of my spam emails to date.
  >      The Professional version does not have this message.
  >      --
  >   References
  >      1. [1][10]http://www.spamfighter.com/len
  >   To get on or off this list see list information at
  >   [2][11]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  >
  >   --
  >
  > References
  >
  >   1. [12]http://www.spamfighter.com/len
  >   2. [13]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  >
  --
  I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
  We are a community of 6 million users fighting spam.
  SPAMfighter has removed 4 of my spam emails to date.
  Get the free SPAMfighter here: [14]http://www.spamfighter.com/len
  The Professional version does not have this message

  --

References

1. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
  2. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  3. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
4. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk 5. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
  6. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
  7. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
  8. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
  9. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu
 10. http://www.spamfighter.com/len
 11. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 12. http://www.spamfighter.com/len
 13. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 14. http://www.spamfighter.com/len



--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
We are a community of 6 million users fighting spam.
SPAMfighter has removed 4 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

The Professional version does not have this message



Reply via email to