I'm also skeptical of an octave G, if for no other reason than the fact
   that Sanz simply doesn't mention it.  He takes pains to say that if you
   want to sound like the fashionable players of the time, then you should
   use such-and-such a stringing.  He never mentions, "And if you *really*
   want to sound good, use an octave on the G" or anything of the kind.
   In fact, I'm not aware of anybody mentioning an octave on the G (please
   correct me if I'm wrong).  On the other hand, I see nothing wrong with
   taking discrete liberties with the written score, and playing the
   higher G when it feels necessary.  I think statistically speaking, if
   you put the burden (no pun intended) on the G course, rather that
   bordones on the D and/or A, you will find fewer cases where you wish
   for an octave other than the one the strings sound -- with Sanz at
   least.  (Can I get an honorary degree if I prove that point?)  And
   further, if you strike the strings equally with your thumb, I think all
   agree (except perhaps Lex) that the lower octave will dominate the
   sensation of what you hear...  biology of the ear, more mass in the
   bordon producing more pressure in the air.  So I personally don't
   believe adding a bordon to the G is worth the cost of fine-tuning my
   technique so I can choose which octave I want to emphasize.
   Technically, it's easier to grab the higher-octave G on a different
   string when I can't live without it.
   That said, it's curious to find passages in Sanz that could easily be
   played with the G', yet are written for the lower octave.  I think
   that's a clue to how differently music was heard at the time.  Take
   measure 2 of the second line in Passacalles sobre la D con muchas
   Diferencias.  Why is that G a lower octave?  Bordones on the D string
   clearly don't solve anything there.  There's no problem either playing
   the G' on the E string, or arranging a campanela that's identical to
   the campanela in the 4th to the last measire of the piece.  Given the
   velocity of the passage, either alternative is well within technical
   reach.  But that's not his choice.  Interesting stuff...
   cud
     __________________________________________________________________

   From: Martyn Hodgson <hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
   To: Chris Despopoulos <despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com>
   Cc: Vihuelalist <vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Tue, November 23, 2010 5:15:03 AM
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Any b-guitar repertoire in all re-entrant
   accepted by all?
     Whatever the case is for an octave on the third course (and to me it
     seems so very slim as to be negligible compared with all the evidence
   -
     other than our modern expectations of course) bear in mind the
   tensile
     strength of gut. An instrument with a string length of 69cm, say,
   would
     struggle to get up to g' at a tone under modern pitch. Whatever the
     'historical' pitch it also seems clear that guitars were generally
   not
     tuned so near to breaking stress as lutes so a safety margin of a
     further tone is appropriate. In short, you'd need to tune a major
   third
     below modern to reasonably employ an octave third. This is, of
   course,
     one of the principal cases against an octave on the third course.
     M
     --- On Mon, 22/11/10, Chris Despopoulos
   <[1]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com>
     wrote:
       From: Chris Despopoulos <[2]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com>
       Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Any b-guitar repertoire in all re-entrant
       accepted by all?
       To: "Monica Hall" <[3]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
       Cc: "Vihuelalist" <[4]vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu>
       Date: Monday, 22 November, 2010, 23:25
         Thanks for the blessing of sorts...  discretion being in the eye
   of
     the
         beholder and all that.  Well then, I think it's either put a
   bordon
     on
         the D string, or sneak the upper octave G into my fingering for
     those
         passages.  It's not a technical problem to accomplish either.
   What
         strikes me as so odd is that this is the only Sanz piece I found
   so
     far
         that causes any serious problems.  I did play for a real Baroque
         guitarist (as opposed to myself -- an amateur) who suggested I
   try
     the
         French stringing, and who echoed your statement that Sanz is not
         writing anything in stone about stringing the instrument.  But in
         general I like having the G as the lowest note for this music.
         cud

   __________________________________________________________________
         From: Monica Hall <[1][5]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
         To: Chris Despopoulos <[2][6]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com>
         Cc: Vihuelalist <[3][7]vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu>
         Sent: Mon, November 22, 2010 2:22:36 PM
         Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Any b-guitar repertoire in all
   re-entrant
         accepted by all?
         That is why some people do argue that octave stringing on the 3rd
         course is intended.
         Gordon Ferries plays it on his CD with the re-entrant tuning.  It
     works
         after a fashion but it is not the best track.
         I think the point is that Sanz doesn't explicitly say that all
   his
         music is intended to be played with the re-entrant tuning.  All
   he
         really doing is generally saying which tuning he thinks works
   best
     for
         which type of music.
         I think you can exercise a bit of discretion in these matters.
         Monica
         ----- Original Message -----
         From: [1]Chris Despopoulos
         To: [2]Monica Hall
         Cc: [3]Vihuelalist
         Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 5:18 PM
         Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: Any b-guitar repertoire in all
   re-entrant
         accepted by all?
         Fuga Primera, por primer Tono al ayre Espanyol, the open G string
   in
         measures (counting from the tablaltura, and not counting the
   notated
         theme):
         5
         19
         23
         25
         (Note the open G in 24 is not a problem, even though its leading
   is
         very similar)
         In these cases, I simply cannot hear a logical leading into the
     lower
         G...  to my ear it desperately wants the upper octave G.  I can
   play
         that upper octave on the E string, but that's not how it's
   written.
         There are other instances of ambiguous leading in this piece (and
     many
         others) where either octave could make sense.  In those cases the
     lower
         octave is not a problem for me, and I find a careful emphasis
   makes
         those notes settle perfectly well into the piece.  But these
   cited
         cases just don't work for me, no matter how hard I try to hear
   it.
     So
         far this is the only piece that troubles me in the Sanz books.
   But
     it
         really troubles me...  I love it and want to fully understand it.
         Some people have suggested there's evidence that Sanz approved of
     and
         possibly used an octave-strung G course.  I'm not convinced --
     Anyway,
         that just pushes the whole issue onto another course and really
     doesn't
         help solve this raging argument about stringing/playing the
   guitar.
         Any advice you can offer on this piece is quite welcome!
         Cheers          cud

   __________________________________________________________________
         From: Monica Hall <[4][8]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk>
         To: Chris Despopoulos <[5][9]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com>
         Cc: Vihuelalist <[6][10]vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu>
         Sent: Mon, November 22, 2010 11:29:50 AM
         Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Any b-guitar repertoire in all re-entrant
         accepted by all?
         Which fugue is it?
         Monica
         ----- Original Message -----
         From: "Chris Despopoulos"
   <[4][7][11]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com>
         To: "wikla" <[5][8][12]wi...@cs.helsinki.fi>
         Cc: <[6][9][13]vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu>
         Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 3:54 PM
         Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Any b-guitar repertoire in all re-entrant
         accepted by
         all?
         >  In my experience, I would say nearly all Sanz definitely
   *works*
         with
         >  fully re-entrant tuning.  I find only one fugue that gives me
   any
         >  problems...  Every other piece I have tried so far sounds
     absolutely
         >  great, and makes perfect sense in a fully re-entrant tuning.
   It
         takes
         >  a little getting used to...  Probably the most difficult
   pieces
     to
         play
         >  are the ones you have played previously on a modern guitar.
   The
         logic
         >  of the pieces may prove to be different than you initially
     thought.
         >  But for all that, the logic is generally consistent...  Except
     that
         one
         >  darned fugue!
         >  cud
         >
     __________________________________________________________________
         >
         >  From: Stuart Walsh <[7][10][14]s.wa...@ntlworld.com>
         >  To: wikla <[8][11][15]wi...@cs.helsinki.fi>
         >  Cc: [9][12][16]vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu
         >  Sent: Sat, November 20, 2010 5:29:16 PM
         >  Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: Any b-guitar repertoire in all
   re-entrant
         >  accepted by all?
         >  > Dear flat-back lutenists,
         >  >
         >  > is there any repertoire/composer of baroque guitar that/who
         without
         >  any
         >  > modern disagreement definitely used the "double re-entrant"
     tuning
         -
         >  the
         >  > 5th and 4th having only in the upper octaves? De Visee
   perhaps?
         >  An interesting question. I'd like to see a list too. And a
   more
         >  contested list of what may well be music for this tuning, but
   not
         >  actually specified.
         >  I think these are definitely for the fully re-entrant tuning:
         >  Valdambrini
         >  Carre
         >  some (?) Sanz
         >  and?....
         >  Stuart
         >  > To a theorbist with two top strings lowered an octave that
     setting
         >  sounds
         >  > really interesting - the opposite way of putting the
     fingerboard
         >  strings
         >  > sound a lot in the same octave! In a therbo in a from A to
   b,
     in
         >  b-guitar
         >  > in e from g to e'.
         >  >
         >  > In this interesting light just considering of getting a
         b-guitar...
         >  :)
         >  >
         >  > Arto
         >  >
         >  >
         >  >
         >  > To get on or off this list see list information at
         >  >

   [1][10][13][17]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
         >  >
         >
         >  --
         >
         > References
         >
         >  1.
     [11][14][18]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
         >
         --
     References
         1. mailto:[15][19]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
         2. mailto:[16][20]mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
         3. mailto:[17][21]vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu
         4. mailto:[18][22]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
         5. mailto:[19][23]wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
         6. mailto:[20][24]vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu
         7. mailto:[21][25]s.wa...@ntlworld.com
         8. mailto:[22][26]wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
         9. mailto:[23][27]vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu
       10.
   [24][28]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
       11.
   [25][29]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
     --
   References
     1.
   [30]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
     2.
   [31]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=despopoulos_chr...@yah
   oo.com
     3.
   [32]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihu...@cs.dartmouth.e
   du
     4.
   [33]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
     5.
   [34]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=despopoulos_chr...@yah
   oo.com
     6.
   [35]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihu...@cs.dartmouth.e
   du
     7.
   [36]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=despopoulos_chr...@yah
   oo.com
     8.
   [37]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
     9.
   [38]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihu...@cs.dartmouth.e
   du
     10.
   [39]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
     11.
   [40]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
     12.
   [41]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihu...@cs.dartmouth.e
   du
     13. [42]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
     14. [43]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
     15.
   [44]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=despopoulos_chr...@yah
   oo.com
     16.
   [45]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
     17.
   [46]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihu...@cs.dartmouth.e
   du
     18.
   [47]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=despopoulos_chr...@yah
   oo.com
     19.
   [48]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
     20.
   [49]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihu...@cs.dartmouth.e
   du
     21.
   [50]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
     22.
   [51]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
     23.
   [52]http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihu...@cs.dartmouth.e
   du
     24. [53]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
     25. [54]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
   2. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
   3. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
   4. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   5. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
   6. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
   7. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   8. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
   9. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  10. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  11. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  12. mailto:wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
  13. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  14. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  15. mailto:wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
  16. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  17. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  18. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  19. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  20. mailto:mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
  21. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  22. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  23. mailto:wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
  24. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  25. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  26. mailto:wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
  27. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  28. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  29. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  30. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
  31. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  32. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  33. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
  34. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  35. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  36. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  37. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
  38. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  39. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  40. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
  41. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  42. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  43. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  44. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  45. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk
  46. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  47. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  48. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
  49. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  50. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  51. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=wi...@cs.helsinki.fi
  52. http://de.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vihu...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  53. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  54. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to