Yes, but I was also getting at the logic of his composition.  He takes
   your right hand and moves it around in ways that you would never
   expect.  And he breaks the voices up in ways that do really hide the
   polyphony... but reveal it at the same time.  It's sort of like a
   painting that suggest the form more than explicitly outlines it.  If
   you look at it in a certain way, you see it like a photograph.  A
   different way of seeing reduces it to loosely connected
   calligraphy. It's truly amazing stuff, and I can't pretend I understand
   it.  But I like it!
   cud
     __________________________________________________________________

   From: "Nelson, Jocelyn" <nels...@ecu.edu>
   To: Chris Despopoulos <despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com>; Stuart Walsh
   <s.wa...@ntlworld.com>
   Cc: Vihuelalist <vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   Sent: Mon, January 17, 2011 11:43:16 AM
   Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: some Ulm mandore pieces
     Hi Chris,
     I think you're too modest about the clarity of texture you achieve,
   but
     I agree that
     tablature can be an excellent type of notation; much more useful than
     we
     moderns expect.
     Best,
     Jocelyn
     On 1/16/2011 4:09 AM, "Chris Despopoulos"
     <[1][1]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
         Thanks for the encouragement.  I'll say that if you can hear
     distinct
         voices in the mandore, blame the composer.  The logic of his
         compositions, and the way he implies continuity in the voices
   when
     the
         plectrum can't carry it explicitly is pure genius.  The tablature
         indicates everything -- up and down strokes are particularly
         important.  You could almost imagine an elaborate wind-up machine
         controlled by the instructions and successfully playing this
   stuff,
         it's that logical.
         Cheers            cud

   __________________________________________________________________
         From: "Nelson, Jocelyn" <[2][2]nels...@ecu.edu>
         To: Chris Despopoulos <[3][3]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com>;
   Stuart
     Walsh
         <[4][4]s.wa...@ntlworld.com>
         Cc: Vihuelalist <[5][5]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>
         Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 7:26:28 PM
         Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: some Ulm mandore pieces
         I enjoyed this, Chris. The voices in the Chancy pieces are clear
   and
         distinct from each other, and it's kind of amazing you were able
   to
         this with a plectrum. So I think you do show the depth in these
     little
         pieces. Chancy's an interesting composer.
         And I like your strums in the Sanz! Thanks for posting and
   sending
     the
         link.
         Best,
         Jocelyn
         ________________________________________
         From: Chris Despopoulos [[1][6][6]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com]
         Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 12:39 PM
         To: Stuart Walsh; Nelson, Jocelyn
         Cc: Vihuelalist
         Subject: Re: [VIHUELA] Re: some Ulm mandore pieces
         Always one to toot my own horn (or pluck my own strings, as it
     were), I
         have posted some recordings on my personal site at:
         [2][7][7]http://cudspan.net/baroque/
         Two tracks are some old recordings I did on the mandore, and
   three
         others are on the baroque guitar...  I keep meaning to do better,
     but
         where's the time?
         Anyway, the mandore recordings are of Chancy's Suite #5, and 3 of
     his
         series of 6 branles.  The tablatures are for a 4-string
   instrument,
     and
         as I understand it, to be played with a plectrum.  At least
   that's
     what
         I was taught by Didier Le Roux and other members of l'Ensemble
     Gabriel
         Leone (I was *very* fortunate to attend a class that reviewed the
         mandolin.  I never made it past the mandore.)
         In spite of being played with a plectrum, the Chancy music is
   full
     of
         hidden polyphony.  For the miniature qualities it has on the
     surface, I
         believe the music is vast in scope...  if only I could reveal a
         fraction of its depth and breadth I'd be happy.
         Anyway, for your enjoyment...  Vive le mandore!
         cheers                      cud
         ________________________________
         From: Stuart Walsh <[3][8][8]s.wa...@ntlworld.com>
         To: "Nelson, Jocelyn" <[4][9][9]nels...@ecu.edu>
         Cc: Vihuelalist <[5][10][10]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu>; Chris
   Despopoulos
         <[6][11][11]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com>
         Sent: Wed, January 12, 2011 11:52:10 AM
         Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: some Ulm mandore pieces
         On 12/01/2011 16:35, Nelson, Jocelyn wrote:
         > Certainly nothing wrong with dances and ballad tunes, as you
         demonstrate.
         >
         > Is the tuning similar to the 4-course?
         >
         > I'm not familiar with mandore literature, and now I'm looking
     forward
         to
         > learning more about it.
         >
         > JN
         >
         >
         >
         Jean-Marie Poirier has a site devoted to the instrument.
         [7][12][12]http://le.luth.free.fr/mandore/index.html
         It's French, of course but  there is a pdf of an article by the
   late
         James Tyler from Early Music. Donald Gill and James Tyler have
   both
         tried to promote the mandore (and the mandolino) and have both
     written
         about them.
         Supposing a tuning with top d (it might be g - or something else)
     then
         a
         four-course tuning would be g-d-g-d (or g-d-g'-d' or maybe I mean
     d'',
         but you get the point!). And a five course instrument would be
         d-g-d-g-d. But on both four and five-course instruments the top
     course
         could be lowered to c, b flat etc. Also the Skene MS has a
   section
     of
         pieces in lute tuning.
         Stuart
         >
         > On 1/11/2011 2:34 PM, "Stuart

   Walsh"<[8][13][13]s.wa...@ntlworld.com<[14]mailto:[9][14]s.walsh@ntlwor
   ld.com>>
       wrote:
         >
         >> On 11/01/2011 01:48, Nelson, Jocelyn wrote:
         >>> I really enjoyed this, Stuart. Thanks for posting!
         >>> Best,
         >>> Jocelyn
         >>>
         >>>
         >>>
         >> Thanks!
         >>
         >> I have only one section of the Ulm collection and in that
   there
     are
         123
         >> pieces for five-course mandore (fingerstyle or mixed plectrum
   and
         >> fingers) and a small number for four-course mandore (probably
         plectrum).
         >> So the Skene and the Ulm collections make up several hundred
     pieces
         -
         >> approaching the size of the repertoire for the four-course
     guitar.
         And
         >> then there are the Chancy pieces and some other things.
         >>
         >> Of course the four-course guitar's repertoire is more varied:
     songs,
         >> abstract pieces, chanson settings as well as dances etc and
   the
         mandore
         >> repertoire seems to be mainly  dances and ballad tunes. Very
   nice
         though.
         >>
         >>
         >> Stuart
         >>
         >>
         >>
         >>> On 1/10/2011 7:04 AM, "Chris

   Despopoulos"<[10][15][15]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com<[16]mailto:[11]de
   spop
     oulos_ch
         [17][16]r...@yahoo.com>>
         >>> wrote:
         >>>
         >>>>    Thanks...  My instrument is 30 cm, and actually 5-course,
         single
         >>>>    strung.  I presume it's made according to historical
         >>>> understanding...
         >>>>    I believe Carlos Gonzales is a historian as well as
   builder
     --
         he's
         >>>>    planning a workshop on building ancient Egyptian/Coptic
     lutes
         this
         >>>>    April, for example.  I prefer to use the thin quill of a
         feather as
         >>>> a
         >>>>    plectrum, as I saw done on the R. lute once.  For as thin
     and
         short
         >>>> as
         >>>>    the strings are, it helps to have something equally tiny
   to
     set
         the
         >>>>    string in motion.  And of course, the Chancy MS is to be
     done
         with a
         >>>>    plectrum as far as I know.
         >>>>    But I have to say, your playing had me fooled...  It
   sounds
         like a
         >>>>    mandore to me!  And they are lovely tunes.
         >>>>    cud
         >>>>

   __________________________________________________________________
         >>>>
         >>>>    From: Stuart

   Walsh<[12][18][17]s.wa...@ntlworld.com<[19]mailto:[13][18]s.walsh@ntlwo
   rld.com>
     >
         >>>>    To:

   Vihuelalist<[14][20][19]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu<[21]mailto:[15]vihuela
   @cs.
     dartmout
         [20]h.edu>>
         >>>>    Sent: Mon, January 10, 2011 6:19:40 AM
         >>>>    Subject: [VIHUELA] Re: some Ulm mandore pieces
         >>>>    Thanks Chris
         >>>>    I should have said I'm not playing these pieces on a
     mandore,
         but
         >>>> on a
         >>>>    small, single-strung instrument, tuned like a mandore. My
         instrument
         >>>>    has a string length of 37cms and so is larger (and, no
     doubt,
         >>>> easier to
         >>>>    play) than a typical four-course, four-string mandore. On
     the
         other
         >>>>    hand, maybe there was a difference in size between the
         four-course
         >>>>    (four-string) plectrum-played mandore and the
   five-course,
         >>>> fingerstyle
         >>>>    (or plectrum+fingers style) instrument.
         >>>>    I knew about the Ulm tablatures from Donald Gill and
   James
         Tyler
         >>>> but it
         >>>>    was Jean-Marie Poirier who pointed me in the direction of
     the
         >>>> Cornetto
         >>>>    catalogue.
         >>>>    [1][16][22][21]http://www.faksimiles.org/verlag.htm
         >>>>    I think there are three separate tabaltures in the Ulm
         collection
         >>>> and
         >>>>    the Cornetto facsimiles are quite expensive. At
   Jean-Marie's
         >>>> suggestion
         >>>>    I got Cornetto catalogue, 0073 which turned out to be two
         >>>>    nicely-produced facsimiles.  The main 'book' (there's
     probably
         a
         >>>>    technical name for a publication roughly 8 inches by 6
     inches)
         has
         >>>>    music for a five course instrument and uses a couple of
     tunings
         but
         >>>>    mainly one (in fourths and fifths, without lowering the
     first
         >>>> course).
         >>>>    Like the Skene MS, it has to be fingerstyle or plectrum
   plus
         >>>> fingers.
         >>>>    The supplementary 'book' has only a few pieces, all or
     mainly
         from
         >>>> the
         >>>>    larger collection, but now set for a four-course
   instrument,
         >>>> presumably
         >>>>    to be played with a plectrum.
         >>>>    Stuart
         >>>>    To get on or off this list see list information at
         >>>>

   [2][17][23][22]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html<[
   18]h
     ttp:
         //www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html>
         >>>>
         >>>>    --
         >>>>
         >>>> References
         >>>>
         >>>>    1. [19][24][23]http://www.faksimiles.org/verlag.htm
         >>>>    2.
     [20][25][24]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
         >>>>
         >>>
         >>>
         >
         >
         >
         --
     References
         1. [26]mailto:[25]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
         2. [27][26]http://cudspan.net/baroque/
         3. [28]mailto:[27]s.wa...@ntlworld.com
         4. [29]mailto:[28]nels...@ecu.edu
         5. [30]mailto:[29]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
         6. [31]mailto:[30]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
         7. [32][31]http://le.luth.free.fr/mandore/index.html
         8. [33]mailto:[32]s.wa...@ntlworld.com
         9. [34]mailto:[33]s.wa...@ntlworld.com
       10. [35]mailto:[34]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
       11. [36]mailto:[35]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
       12. [37]mailto:[36]s.wa...@ntlworld.com
       13. [38]mailto:[37]s.wa...@ntlworld.com
       14. [39]mailto:[38]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
       15. [40]mailto:[39]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
       16. [41][40]http://www.faksimiles.org/verlag.htm
       17.
   [42][41]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
       18.
   [43][42]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
       19. [44][43]http://www.faksimiles.org/verlag.htm
       20.
   [45][44]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
     --
   References
     1. mailto:[45]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
     2. mailto:[46]nels...@ecu.edu
     3. mailto:[47]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
     4. mailto:[48]s.wa...@ntlworld.com
     5. mailto:[49]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
     6. mailto:[50]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
     7. [51]http://cudspan.net/baroque/
     8. mailto:[52]s.wa...@ntlworld.com
     9. mailto:[53]nels...@ecu.edu
     10. mailto:[54]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
     11. mailto:[55]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
     12. [56]http://le.luth.free.fr/mandore/index.html
     13. mailto:[57]s.wa...@ntlworld.com
     14. mailto:[9][58]s.wa...@ntlworld.com>
     15. mailto:[59]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
     16. mailto:[11]despopoulos_ch
     17. mailto:[60]r...@yahoo.com
     18. mailto:[61]s.wa...@ntlworld.com
     19. mailto:[13][62]s.wa...@ntlworld.com>
     20. mailto:[63]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
     21. mailto:[15][64]vihuela@cs.dartmout
     22. [65]http://www.faksimiles.org/verlag.htm
     23.
   [66]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html<[18]http
     24. [67]http://www.faksimiles.org/verlag.htm
     25. [68]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
     26. mailto:[69]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
     27. [70]http://cudspan.net/baroque/
     28. mailto:[71]s.wa...@ntlworld.com
     29. mailto:[72]nels...@ecu.edu
     30. mailto:[73]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
     31. mailto:[74]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
     32. [75]http://le.luth.free.fr/mandore/index.html
     33. mailto:[76]s.wa...@ntlworld.com
     34. mailto:[77]s.wa...@ntlworld.com
     35. mailto:[78]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
     36. mailto:[79]despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
     37. mailto:[80]s.wa...@ntlworld.com
     38. mailto:[81]s.wa...@ntlworld.com
     39. mailto:[82]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
     40. mailto:[83]vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
     41. [84]http://www.faksimiles.org/verlag.htm
     42. [85]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
     43. [86]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
     44. [87]http://www.faksimiles.org/verlag.htm
     45. [88]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
   2. mailto:nels...@ecu.edu
   3. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
   4. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
   5. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
   6. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
   7. http://cudspan.net/baroque/
   8. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
   9. mailto:nels...@ecu.edu
  10. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  11. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  12. http://le.luth.free.fr/mandore/index.html
  13. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  14. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  15. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  16. mailto:r...@yahoo.com
  17. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  18. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  19. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  20. http://h.edu/
  21. http://www.faksimiles.org/verlag.htm
  22. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  23. http://www.faksimiles.org/verlag.htm
  24. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  25. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  26. http://cudspan.net/baroque/
  27. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  28. mailto:nels...@ecu.edu
  29. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  30. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  31. http://le.luth.free.fr/mandore/index.html
  32. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  33. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  34. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  35. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  36. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  37. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  38. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  39. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  40. http://www.faksimiles.org/verlag.htm
  41. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  42. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  43. http://www.faksimiles.org/verlag.htm
  44. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  45. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  46. mailto:nels...@ecu.edu
  47. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  48. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  49. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  50. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  51. http://cudspan.net/baroque/
  52. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  53. mailto:nels...@ecu.edu
  54. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  55. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  56. http://le.luth.free.fr/mandore/index.html
  57. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  58. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  59. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  60. mailto:r...@yahoo.com
  61. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  62. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  63. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  64. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmout
  65. http://www.faksimiles.org/verlag.htm
  66. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  67. http://www.faksimiles.org/verlag.htm
  68. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  69. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  70. http://cudspan.net/baroque/
  71. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  72. mailto:nels...@ecu.edu
  73. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  74. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  75. http://le.luth.free.fr/mandore/index.html
  76. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  77. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  78. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  79. mailto:despopoulos_chr...@yahoo.com
  80. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  81. mailto:s.wa...@ntlworld.com
  82. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  83. mailto:vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu
  84. http://www.faksimiles.org/verlag.htm
  85. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  86. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  87. http://www.faksimiles.org/verlag.htm
  88. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to