On 05/06/08 05:05, Bill McCarthy wrote:
> On Wed 4-Jun-08 3:42pm -0600, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
>> Anyway, here is a patch to accept plain floating point numbers. Goes on
>> top of the previous floating point patch. Give it a try and find out if
>> any of your scripts break.
>
> My eval.c is the current release patched by both your latest
> and John Beckett's fix. You new patch fails with:
>
> vim\vimfp> patch -b -p 0 -i Brams-may_not_work_with_jb.diff
> patching file src/eval.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 4799.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/eval.c.rej
>
> I'm not great at reading patch files, but my eval.c does
> contain:
>
> ===============================================
> case '7':
> case '8':
> case '9':
> vim_str2nr(*arg, NULL,&len, TRUE, TRUE,&n, NULL);
> *arg += len;
> if (evaluate)
> {
> rettv->v_type = VAR_NUMBER;
> rettv->vval.v_number = n;
> }
> break;
>
> /*
> * String constant: "string".
> ===============================================
>
> So it looks like - to me - that you patch should patch.
>
Works for me:
linux:~/.build/vim-test/vim71 # patch --dry-run -p0<patches/Floating\
point\ noampersand.eml
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file src/eval.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 4998 (offset 199 lines).
linux:~/.build/vim-test/vim71 #
Best regards,
Tony.
--
Getting an education at the University of California is like having
$50.00 shoved up your ass, a nickel at a time.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
