Richard Hartmann wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 16:22, Charles Campbell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> The only criticism I could make of MH's patch, and perhaps I'm just >> ignorant of how to do it -- but I rather like the plugin's different >> colorization of previous vs future relative numbers, and would like it >> if the relative numbering patch would provide something similar. >> > > Can you explain how exactly that works? I never really tried the > plugin, only the patch, but I like that, at least. > :hi HL_RltvNmbr_Minus gui=none ctermfg=yellow ctermbg=black guifg=yellow guibg=black
would change the negative relative numbers to not-italic, yellow on black. Typically most filetypes clear the syntax before setting up their highlighting, so putting lines such as the above in .vimrc, .vim/after/plugin, etc doesn't work. Putting it in .vim/after/syntax/[FILETYPE].vim files would. My preferred solution would be to use autocmds. Putting the following line in .vim/after/plugin works: au FileType * hi HL_RltvNmbr_Minus gui=none ctermfg=yellow ctermbg=black guifg=yellow guibg=black Probably should put that idea into the RltvNmbr.vim help. > Do I assume correctly that there is no clean way to check for the > existance of the patch at run-time, yet? I would love to adopt my > keybindings depending on if the patch is applied or not. > I'll leave the answer to that to Markus Heidelberg. Regards, Chip Campbell --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
