Nico Weber wrote: > Hi, > > On 03.05.2009, at 00:03, Dominique Pellé wrote: > >> After applying your patch, there are no such errors anymore. >> >> However, when exiting, I see that those blocks are not being >> freed: >> >> ==16990== 217 bytes in 10 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 36 >> of 57 >> ==16990== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) >> ==16990== by 0x81142FA: lalloc (misc2.c:866) >> ==16990== by 0x8114216: alloc (misc2.c:765) >> ==16990== by 0x807AD1D: dictitem_alloc (eval.c:6775) >> ==16990== by 0x8074FFD: set_var_lval (eval.c:2856) >> ==16990== by 0x80742F4: ex_let_one (eval.c:2414) >> ==16990== by 0x807329F: ex_let_vars (eval.c:1869) >> ==16990== by 0x8073250: ex_let (eval.c:1834) >> ==16990== by 0x80A6AA3: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) >> ==16990== by 0x80A4323: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) >> ==16990== by 0x8090328: call_user_func (eval.c:21301) >> ==16990== by 0x807C4FE: call_func (eval.c:8079) >> ==16990== by 0x807C142: get_func_tv (eval.c:7925) >> ==16990== by 0x8075B83: ex_call (eval.c:3333) >> ==16990== by 0x80A6AA3: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) >> ==16990== by 0x80A4323: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) >> ==16990== by 0x812A758: nv_colon (normal.c:5227) >> ==16990== by 0x8123DA2: normal_cmd (normal.c:1189) >> ==16990== by 0x80E6D49: main_loop (main.c:1180) >> ==16990== by 0x80E6896: main (main.c:939) >> >> I built Vim with -DEXITFREE (i.e. uncommented line >> PROFILE_CFLAGS = -DEXITFREE in src/Makefile) >> so normally all blocks should be freed when exiting. > > Thanks for checking. > > I've attached an updated version of the patch that fixes some of the > leaks. The copy()d dicts in the script don't get freed, but I don't > (yet?) understand why. > > Nico
I tried to fix the leak as well but without success so far. It does not seem simple. In any cases, it's a real leak, running the following leak.vim script for example causes Vim memory usage to grow continuously: --- 8< --- cut here --- 8< --- cut here --- 8< --- set nocp " foo.vim is the script attached in the original bug submission " at http://groups.google.com/group/vim_mac/browse_thread/thread/4e0149ff4f84e3d3 so foo.vim let g:count_loops = 0 while 1 call foo#Buffer.New() q let g:count_loops = g:count_loops + 1 endwhile --- 8< --- cut here --- 8< --- cut here --- 8< --- I do: $ vim -u NONE leak.vim :so % Then in another xterm, I can see with "top" that memory usage of Vim keeps increasing. If I run the leak.vim script with Valgrind... valgrind --leak-resolution=high --leak-check=yes \ --num-callers=30 --track-fds=yes 2> vg.log \ ./vim -u NONE leak.vim Then do: - :so % - let the script execute for some time - press CTRL-C to interrupt the infinite loop - Look at how many times loop iterated with :echo g:count_loops (it prints 2774 for example) - then quit vim: qa! Then look for leaks in vg.log, and observe that some leaks happen exactly 2774 times (same number as number as g:loop_count): ==22962== 27,740 bytes in 2,774 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 113 of 125 ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866) ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765) ==22962== by 0x8114C16: vim_strsave (misc2.c:1177) ==22962== by 0x808C427: copy_tv (eval.c:19380) ==22962== by 0x808AE51: get_var_tv (eval.c:18452) ==22962== by 0x80785E7: eval7 (eval.c:5032) ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685) ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501) ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196) ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108) ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037) ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962) ==22962== by 0x8079667: get_list_tv (eval.c:5675) ==22962== by 0x807837D: eval7 (eval.c:4943) ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685) ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501) ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196) ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108) ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037) ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962) ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919) ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381) ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== ==22962== ==22962== 33,288 bytes in 5,548 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 114 of 125 ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866) ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765) ==22962== by 0x8114C16: vim_strsave (misc2.c:1177) ==22962== by 0x808C427: copy_tv (eval.c:19380) ==22962== by 0x807B117: dict_copy (eval.c:6961) ==22962== by 0x808C662: item_copy (eval.c:19471) ==22962== by 0x807DB82: f_copy (eval.c:9141) ==22962== by 0x807C7DF: call_func (eval.c:8188) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x807859A: eval7 (eval.c:5018) ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685) ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501) ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196) ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108) ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037) ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962) ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919) ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381) ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x80A2793: do_source (ex_cmds2.c:3119) ==22962== by 0x80A2047: cmd_source (ex_cmds2.c:2741) ==22962== by 0x80A1F9B: ex_source (ex_cmds2.c:2714) ==22962== ==22962== ==22962== 49,932 bytes in 8,322 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 115 of 125 ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866) ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765) ==22962== by 0x8114C16: vim_strsave (misc2.c:1177) ==22962== by 0x808C427: copy_tv (eval.c:19380) ==22962== by 0x807B117: dict_copy (eval.c:6961) ==22962== by 0x808C662: item_copy (eval.c:19471) ==22962== by 0x807DB82: f_copy (eval.c:9141) ==22962== by 0x807C7DF: call_func (eval.c:8188) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x807859A: eval7 (eval.c:5018) ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685) ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501) ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196) ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108) ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037) ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962) ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919) ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381) ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x808AF05: handle_subscript (eval.c:18491) ==22962== by 0x8078640: eval7 (eval.c:5046) ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685) ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501) ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196) ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108) ==22962== ==22962== ==22962== 58,254 bytes in 2,774 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 116 of 125 ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866) ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765) ==22962== by 0x807AEFC: dictitem_alloc (eval.c:6855) ==22962== by 0x807507D: set_var_lval (eval.c:2864) ==22962== by 0x8074374: ex_let_one (eval.c:2422) ==22962== by 0x807331F: ex_let_vars (eval.c:1877) ==22962== by 0x80732D0: ex_let (eval.c:1842) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381) ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381) ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x80A2793: do_source (ex_cmds2.c:3119) ==22962== by 0x80A2047: cmd_source (ex_cmds2.c:2741) ==22962== by 0x80A1F9B: ex_source (ex_cmds2.c:2714) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x812ACC4: nv_colon (normal.c:5227) ==22962== by 0x812430E: normal_cmd (normal.c:1189) ==22962== by 0x80E6F3D: main_loop (main.c:1180) ==22962== ==22962== ==22962== 77,672 bytes in 2,774 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 117 of 125 ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866) ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765) ==22962== by 0x807AEFC: dictitem_alloc (eval.c:6855) ==22962== by 0x807507D: set_var_lval (eval.c:2864) ==22962== by 0x8074374: ex_let_one (eval.c:2422) ==22962== by 0x807331F: ex_let_vars (eval.c:1877) ==22962== by 0x80732D0: ex_let (eval.c:1842) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381) ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x808AF05: handle_subscript (eval.c:18491) ==22962== by 0x8078640: eval7 (eval.c:5046) ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685) ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501) ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196) ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108) ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037) ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962) ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919) ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381) ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== ==22962== ==22962== 133,152 bytes in 5,548 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 118 of 125 ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866) ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765) ==22962== by 0x807AEFC: dictitem_alloc (eval.c:6855) ==22962== by 0x807B0B3: dict_copy (eval.c:6948) ==22962== by 0x808C662: item_copy (eval.c:19471) ==22962== by 0x807DB82: f_copy (eval.c:9141) ==22962== by 0x807C7DF: call_func (eval.c:8188) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x807859A: eval7 (eval.c:5018) ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685) ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501) ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196) ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108) ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037) ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962) ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919) ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381) ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x80A2793: do_source (ex_cmds2.c:3119) ==22962== by 0x80A2047: cmd_source (ex_cmds2.c:2741) ==22962== by 0x80A1F9B: ex_source (ex_cmds2.c:2714) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== ==22962== ==22962== 160,892 bytes in 5,548 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 119 of 125 ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866) ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765) ==22962== by 0x807AEFC: dictitem_alloc (eval.c:6855) ==22962== by 0x807507D: set_var_lval (eval.c:2864) ==22962== by 0x8074374: ex_let_one (eval.c:2422) ==22962== by 0x807331F: ex_let_vars (eval.c:1877) ==22962== by 0x80732D0: ex_let (eval.c:1842) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381) ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x80A2793: do_source (ex_cmds2.c:3119) ==22962== by 0x80A2047: cmd_source (ex_cmds2.c:2741) ==22962== by 0x80A1F9B: ex_source (ex_cmds2.c:2714) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x812ACC4: nv_colon (normal.c:5227) ==22962== by 0x812430E: normal_cmd (normal.c:1189) ==22962== by 0x80E6F3D: main_loop (main.c:1180) ==22962== by 0x80E6A8A: main (main.c:939) ==22962== ==22962== ==22962== 213,598 bytes in 8,322 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 120 of 125 ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866) ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765) ==22962== by 0x807AEFC: dictitem_alloc (eval.c:6855) ==22962== by 0x807B0B3: dict_copy (eval.c:6948) ==22962== by 0x808C662: item_copy (eval.c:19471) ==22962== by 0x807DB82: f_copy (eval.c:9141) ==22962== by 0x807C7DF: call_func (eval.c:8188) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x807859A: eval7 (eval.c:5018) ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685) ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501) ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196) ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108) ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037) ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962) ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919) ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381) ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x808AF05: handle_subscript (eval.c:18491) ==22962== by 0x8078640: eval7 (eval.c:5046) ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685) ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501) ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196) ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108) ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037) ==22962== ==22962== ==22962== 288,496 bytes in 5,548 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 121 of 125 ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866) ==22962== by 0x8114723: alloc_clear (misc2.c:777) ==22962== by 0x80797D0: list_alloc (eval.c:5729) ==22962== by 0x807961D: get_list_tv (eval.c:5667) ==22962== by 0x807837D: eval7 (eval.c:4943) ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685) ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501) ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196) ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108) ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037) ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962) ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919) ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381) ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381) ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x80A2793: do_source (ex_cmds2.c:3119) ==22962== by 0x80A2047: cmd_source (ex_cmds2.c:2741) ==22962== ==22962== ==22962== 399,456 bytes in 16,644 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 122 of 125 ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866) ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765) ==22962== by 0x807994D: listitem_alloc (eval.c:5810) ==22962== by 0x807967A: get_list_tv (eval.c:5679) ==22962== by 0x807837D: eval7 (eval.c:4943) ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685) ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501) ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196) ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108) ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037) ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962) ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919) ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381) ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381) ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x80A2793: do_source (ex_cmds2.c:3119) ==22962== by 0x80A2047: cmd_source (ex_cmds2.c:2741) ==22962== ==22962== ==22962== 499,320 bytes in 2,774 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 123 of 125 ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866) ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765) ==22962== by 0x807AD1E: dict_alloc (eval.c:6770) ==22962== by 0x807B6A8: get_dict_tv (eval.c:7216) ==22962== by 0x807839E: eval7 (eval.c:4949) ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685) ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501) ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196) ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108) ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037) ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962) ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919) ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381) ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x808AF05: handle_subscript (eval.c:18491) ==22962== by 0x8078640: eval7 (eval.c:5046) ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685) ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501) ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196) ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108) ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037) ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962) ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919) ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== ==22962== ==22962== 499,320 bytes in 2,774 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 124 of 125 ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866) ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765) ==22962== by 0x807AD1E: dict_alloc (eval.c:6770) ==22962== by 0x807B040: dict_copy (eval.c:6933) ==22962== by 0x808C662: item_copy (eval.c:19471) ==22962== by 0x807DB82: f_copy (eval.c:9141) ==22962== by 0x807C7DF: call_func (eval.c:8188) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x807859A: eval7 (eval.c:5018) ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685) ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501) ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196) ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108) ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037) ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962) ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919) ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381) ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x808AF05: handle_subscript (eval.c:18491) ==22962== by 0x8078640: eval7 (eval.c:5046) ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685) ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501) ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196) ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108) ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037) ==22962== ==22962== ==22962== 499,320 bytes in 2,774 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 125 of 125 ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866) ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765) ==22962== by 0x807AD1E: dict_alloc (eval.c:6770) ==22962== by 0x807B040: dict_copy (eval.c:6933) ==22962== by 0x808C662: item_copy (eval.c:19471) ==22962== by 0x807DB82: f_copy (eval.c:9141) ==22962== by 0x807C7DF: call_func (eval.c:8188) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x807859A: eval7 (eval.c:5018) ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685) ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501) ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196) ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108) ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037) ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962) ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919) ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381) ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159) ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005) ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096) ==22962== by 0x80A2793: do_source (ex_cmds2.c:3119) ==22962== by 0x80A2047: cmd_source (ex_cmds2.c:2741) ==22962== by 0x80A1F9B: ex_source (ex_cmds2.c:2714) ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622) -- Dominique --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
