2009/5/22 Bram Moolenaar <b...@moolenaar.net>:
>
>
> Dominique Pelle wrote:
>
>> Nico Weber wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On 03.05.2009, at 00:03, Dominique Pellé wrote:
>> >
>> >> After applying your patch, there are no such errors anymore.
>> >>
>> >> However, when exiting, I see that those blocks are not being
>> >> freed:
>> >>
>> >> ==16990== 217 bytes in 10 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 36
>> >> of 57
>> >> ==16990== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
>> >> ==16990== by 0x81142FA: lalloc (misc2.c:866)
>> >> ==16990== by 0x8114216: alloc (misc2.c:765)
>> >> ==16990== by 0x807AD1D: dictitem_alloc (eval.c:6775)
>> >> ==16990== by 0x8074FFD: set_var_lval (eval.c:2856)
>> >> ==16990== by 0x80742F4: ex_let_one (eval.c:2414)
>> >> ==16990== by 0x807329F: ex_let_vars (eval.c:1869)
>> >> ==16990== by 0x8073250: ex_let (eval.c:1834)
>> >> ==16990== by 0x80A6AA3: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> >> ==16990== by 0x80A4323: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> >> ==16990== by 0x8090328: call_user_func (eval.c:21301)
>> >> ==16990== by 0x807C4FE: call_func (eval.c:8079)
>> >> ==16990== by 0x807C142: get_func_tv (eval.c:7925)
>> >> ==16990== by 0x8075B83: ex_call (eval.c:3333)
>> >> ==16990== by 0x80A6AA3: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> >> ==16990== by 0x80A4323: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> >> ==16990== by 0x812A758: nv_colon (normal.c:5227)
>> >> ==16990== by 0x8123DA2: normal_cmd (normal.c:1189)
>> >> ==16990== by 0x80E6D49: main_loop (main.c:1180)
>> >> ==16990== by 0x80E6896: main (main.c:939)
>> >>
>> >> I built Vim with -DEXITFREE (i.e. uncommented line
>> >> PROFILE_CFLAGS = -DEXITFREE in src/Makefile)
>> >> so normally all blocks should be freed when exiting.
>> >
>> > Thanks for checking.
>> >
>> > I've attached an updated version of the patch that fixes some of the
>> > leaks. The copy()d dicts in the script don't get freed, but I don't
>> > (yet?) understand why.
>> >
>> > Nico
>>
>>
>> I tried to fix the leak as well but without success so far.
>> It does not seem simple.
>>
>> In any cases, it's a real leak, running the following leak.vim
>> script for example causes Vim memory usage to grow
>> continuously:
>>
>> --- 8< --- cut here --- 8< --- cut here --- 8< ---
>> set nocp
>>
>> " foo.vim is the script attached in the original bug submission
>> " at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/vim_mac/browse_thread/thread/4e0149ff4f84e3d3
>> so foo.vim
>>
>> let g:count_loops = 0
>> while 1
>> call foo#Buffer.New()
>> q
>> let g:count_loops = g:count_loops + 1
>> endwhile
>> --- 8< --- cut here --- 8< --- cut here --- 8< ---
>>
>> I do:
>>
>> $ vim -u NONE leak.vim
>> :so %
>>
>> Then in another xterm, I can see with "top" that memory usage
>> of Vim keeps increasing.
>>
>> If I run the leak.vim script with Valgrind...
>>
>> valgrind --leak-resolution=high --leak-check=yes \
>> --num-callers=30 --track-fds=yes 2> vg.log \
>> ./vim -u NONE leak.vim
>>
>> Then do:
>> - :so %
>> - let the script execute for some time
>> - press CTRL-C to interrupt the infinite loop
>> - Look at how many times loop iterated with
>> :echo g:count_loops
>> (it prints 2774 for example)
>> - then quit vim: qa!
>>
>> Then look for leaks in vg.log, and observe that some leaks
>> happen exactly 2774 times (same number as number as
>> g:loop_count):
>>
>> ==22962== 27,740 bytes in 2,774 blocks are possibly lost in loss
>> record 113 of 125
>> ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
>> ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866)
>> ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765)
>> ==22962== by 0x8114C16: vim_strsave (misc2.c:1177)
>> ==22962== by 0x808C427: copy_tv (eval.c:19380)
>> ==22962== by 0x808AE51: get_var_tv (eval.c:18452)
>> ==22962== by 0x80785E7: eval7 (eval.c:5032)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962)
>> ==22962== by 0x8079667: get_list_tv (eval.c:5675)
>> ==22962== by 0x807837D: eval7 (eval.c:4943)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919)
>> ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962== 33,288 bytes in 5,548 blocks are possibly lost in loss
>> record 114 of 125
>> ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
>> ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866)
>> ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765)
>> ==22962== by 0x8114C16: vim_strsave (misc2.c:1177)
>> ==22962== by 0x808C427: copy_tv (eval.c:19380)
>> ==22962== by 0x807B117: dict_copy (eval.c:6961)
>> ==22962== by 0x808C662: item_copy (eval.c:19471)
>> ==22962== by 0x807DB82: f_copy (eval.c:9141)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C7DF: call_func (eval.c:8188)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x807859A: eval7 (eval.c:5018)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919)
>> ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A2793: do_source (ex_cmds2.c:3119)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A2047: cmd_source (ex_cmds2.c:2741)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A1F9B: ex_source (ex_cmds2.c:2714)
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962== 49,932 bytes in 8,322 blocks are possibly lost in loss
>> record 115 of 125
>> ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
>> ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866)
>> ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765)
>> ==22962== by 0x8114C16: vim_strsave (misc2.c:1177)
>> ==22962== by 0x808C427: copy_tv (eval.c:19380)
>> ==22962== by 0x807B117: dict_copy (eval.c:6961)
>> ==22962== by 0x808C662: item_copy (eval.c:19471)
>> ==22962== by 0x807DB82: f_copy (eval.c:9141)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C7DF: call_func (eval.c:8188)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x807859A: eval7 (eval.c:5018)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919)
>> ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x808AF05: handle_subscript (eval.c:18491)
>> ==22962== by 0x8078640: eval7 (eval.c:5046)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108)
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962== 58,254 bytes in 2,774 blocks are possibly lost in loss
>> record 116 of 125
>> ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
>> ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866)
>> ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765)
>> ==22962== by 0x807AEFC: dictitem_alloc (eval.c:6855)
>> ==22962== by 0x807507D: set_var_lval (eval.c:2864)
>> ==22962== by 0x8074374: ex_let_one (eval.c:2422)
>> ==22962== by 0x807331F: ex_let_vars (eval.c:1877)
>> ==22962== by 0x80732D0: ex_let (eval.c:1842)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A2793: do_source (ex_cmds2.c:3119)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A2047: cmd_source (ex_cmds2.c:2741)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A1F9B: ex_source (ex_cmds2.c:2714)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x812ACC4: nv_colon (normal.c:5227)
>> ==22962== by 0x812430E: normal_cmd (normal.c:1189)
>> ==22962== by 0x80E6F3D: main_loop (main.c:1180)
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962== 77,672 bytes in 2,774 blocks are possibly lost in loss
>> record 117 of 125
>> ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
>> ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866)
>> ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765)
>> ==22962== by 0x807AEFC: dictitem_alloc (eval.c:6855)
>> ==22962== by 0x807507D: set_var_lval (eval.c:2864)
>> ==22962== by 0x8074374: ex_let_one (eval.c:2422)
>> ==22962== by 0x807331F: ex_let_vars (eval.c:1877)
>> ==22962== by 0x80732D0: ex_let (eval.c:1842)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x808AF05: handle_subscript (eval.c:18491)
>> ==22962== by 0x8078640: eval7 (eval.c:5046)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919)
>> ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962== 133,152 bytes in 5,548 blocks are possibly lost in loss
>> record 118 of 125
>> ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
>> ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866)
>> ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765)
>> ==22962== by 0x807AEFC: dictitem_alloc (eval.c:6855)
>> ==22962== by 0x807B0B3: dict_copy (eval.c:6948)
>> ==22962== by 0x808C662: item_copy (eval.c:19471)
>> ==22962== by 0x807DB82: f_copy (eval.c:9141)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C7DF: call_func (eval.c:8188)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x807859A: eval7 (eval.c:5018)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919)
>> ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A2793: do_source (ex_cmds2.c:3119)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A2047: cmd_source (ex_cmds2.c:2741)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A1F9B: ex_source (ex_cmds2.c:2714)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962== 160,892 bytes in 5,548 blocks are possibly lost in loss
>> record 119 of 125
>> ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
>> ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866)
>> ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765)
>> ==22962== by 0x807AEFC: dictitem_alloc (eval.c:6855)
>> ==22962== by 0x807507D: set_var_lval (eval.c:2864)
>> ==22962== by 0x8074374: ex_let_one (eval.c:2422)
>> ==22962== by 0x807331F: ex_let_vars (eval.c:1877)
>> ==22962== by 0x80732D0: ex_let (eval.c:1842)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A2793: do_source (ex_cmds2.c:3119)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A2047: cmd_source (ex_cmds2.c:2741)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A1F9B: ex_source (ex_cmds2.c:2714)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x812ACC4: nv_colon (normal.c:5227)
>> ==22962== by 0x812430E: normal_cmd (normal.c:1189)
>> ==22962== by 0x80E6F3D: main_loop (main.c:1180)
>> ==22962== by 0x80E6A8A: main (main.c:939)
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962== 213,598 bytes in 8,322 blocks are possibly lost in loss
>> record 120 of 125
>> ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
>> ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866)
>> ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765)
>> ==22962== by 0x807AEFC: dictitem_alloc (eval.c:6855)
>> ==22962== by 0x807B0B3: dict_copy (eval.c:6948)
>> ==22962== by 0x808C662: item_copy (eval.c:19471)
>> ==22962== by 0x807DB82: f_copy (eval.c:9141)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C7DF: call_func (eval.c:8188)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x807859A: eval7 (eval.c:5018)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919)
>> ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x808AF05: handle_subscript (eval.c:18491)
>> ==22962== by 0x8078640: eval7 (eval.c:5046)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037)
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962== 288,496 bytes in 5,548 blocks are possibly lost in loss
>> record 121 of 125
>> ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
>> ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866)
>> ==22962== by 0x8114723: alloc_clear (misc2.c:777)
>> ==22962== by 0x80797D0: list_alloc (eval.c:5729)
>> ==22962== by 0x807961D: get_list_tv (eval.c:5667)
>> ==22962== by 0x807837D: eval7 (eval.c:4943)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919)
>> ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A2793: do_source (ex_cmds2.c:3119)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A2047: cmd_source (ex_cmds2.c:2741)
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962== 399,456 bytes in 16,644 blocks are possibly lost in loss
>> record 122 of 125
>> ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
>> ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866)
>> ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765)
>> ==22962== by 0x807994D: listitem_alloc (eval.c:5810)
>> ==22962== by 0x807967A: get_list_tv (eval.c:5679)
>> ==22962== by 0x807837D: eval7 (eval.c:4943)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919)
>> ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A2793: do_source (ex_cmds2.c:3119)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A2047: cmd_source (ex_cmds2.c:2741)
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962== 499,320 bytes in 2,774 blocks are possibly lost in loss
>> record 123 of 125
>> ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
>> ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866)
>> ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765)
>> ==22962== by 0x807AD1E: dict_alloc (eval.c:6770)
>> ==22962== by 0x807B6A8: get_dict_tv (eval.c:7216)
>> ==22962== by 0x807839E: eval7 (eval.c:4949)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919)
>> ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x808AF05: handle_subscript (eval.c:18491)
>> ==22962== by 0x8078640: eval7 (eval.c:5046)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919)
>> ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962== 499,320 bytes in 2,774 blocks are possibly lost in loss
>> record 124 of 125
>> ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
>> ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866)
>> ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765)
>> ==22962== by 0x807AD1E: dict_alloc (eval.c:6770)
>> ==22962== by 0x807B040: dict_copy (eval.c:6933)
>> ==22962== by 0x808C662: item_copy (eval.c:19471)
>> ==22962== by 0x807DB82: f_copy (eval.c:9141)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C7DF: call_func (eval.c:8188)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x807859A: eval7 (eval.c:5018)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919)
>> ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x808AF05: handle_subscript (eval.c:18491)
>> ==22962== by 0x8078640: eval7 (eval.c:5046)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037)
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962==
>> ==22962== 499,320 bytes in 2,774 blocks are possibly lost in loss
>> record 125 of 125
>> ==22962== at 0x402603E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
>> ==22962== by 0x81147FD: lalloc (misc2.c:866)
>> ==22962== by 0x8114708: alloc (misc2.c:765)
>> ==22962== by 0x807AD1E: dict_alloc (eval.c:6770)
>> ==22962== by 0x807B040: dict_copy (eval.c:6933)
>> ==22962== by 0x808C662: item_copy (eval.c:19471)
>> ==22962== by 0x807DB82: f_copy (eval.c:9141)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C7DF: call_func (eval.c:8188)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x807859A: eval7 (eval.c:5018)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077EA3: eval6 (eval.c:4685)
>> ==22962== by 0x8077A8F: eval5 (eval.c:4501)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076FE0: eval4 (eval.c:4196)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076E38: eval3 (eval.c:4108)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076CC4: eval2 (eval.c:4037)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076AF4: eval1 (eval.c:3962)
>> ==22962== by 0x8076A5B: eval0 (eval.c:3919)
>> ==22962== by 0x807326C: ex_let (eval.c:1833)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x8090507: call_user_func (eval.c:21381)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C6DD: call_func (eval.c:8159)
>> ==22962== by 0x807C321: get_func_tv (eval.c:8005)
>> ==22962== by 0x8075C03: ex_call (eval.c:3341)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A450B: do_cmdline (ex_docmd.c:1096)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A2793: do_source (ex_cmds2.c:3119)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A2047: cmd_source (ex_cmds2.c:2741)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A1F9B: ex_source (ex_cmds2.c:2714)
>> ==22962== by 0x80A6C8B: do_one_cmd (ex_docmd.c:2622)
>
> Here is a new patch that hopefully fixes both the crash and the leaks.
> It's a bit tricky, but I think this catches all situations.
> Please verify.
>
> Note that with your script one needs to wait a few moments before
> exiting to give the garbage collector a chance.
>
>
> *** ../vim-7.2.185/src/eval.c 2009-05-16 17:29:37.000000000 +0200
> --- src/eval.c 2009-05-22 20:04:22.000000000 +0200
> ***************
> *** 129,136 ****
> --- 129,139 ----
> /*
> * When recursively copying lists and dicts we need to remember which ones we
> * have done to avoid endless recursiveness. This unique ID is used for
> that.
> + * The last bit is used for previous_funccal, ignored when comparing.
> */
> static int current_copyID = 0;
> + #define COPYID_INC 2
> + #define COPYID_MASK (~0x1)
>
> /*
> * Array to hold the hashtab with variables local to each sourced script.
> ***************
> *** 439,444 ****
> --- 442,448 ----
> static void list_remove __ARGS((list_T *l, listitem_T *item, listitem_T
> *item2));
> static char_u *list2string __ARGS((typval_T *tv, int copyID));
> static int list_join __ARGS((garray_T *gap, list_T *l, char_u *sep, int
> echo, int copyID));
> + static int free_unref_items __ARGS((int copyID));
> static void set_ref_in_ht __ARGS((hashtab_T *ht, int copyID));
> static void set_ref_in_list __ARGS((list_T *l, int copyID));
> static void set_ref_in_item __ARGS((typval_T *tv, int copyID));
> ***************
> *** 6494,6507 ****
> int
> garbage_collect()
> {
> ! dict_T *dd;
> ! list_T *ll;
> ! int copyID = ++current_copyID;
> buf_T *buf;
> win_T *wp;
> int i;
> funccall_T *fc, **pfc;
> ! int did_free = FALSE;
> #ifdef FEAT_WINDOWS
> tabpage_T *tp;
> #endif
> --- 6498,6510 ----
> int
> garbage_collect()
> {
> ! int copyID;
> buf_T *buf;
> win_T *wp;
> int i;
> funccall_T *fc, **pfc;
> ! int did_free;
> ! int did_free_funccal = FALSE;
> #ifdef FEAT_WINDOWS
> tabpage_T *tp;
> #endif
> ***************
> *** 6511,6520 ****
> --- 6514,6538 ----
> may_garbage_collect = FALSE;
> garbage_collect_at_exit = FALSE;
>
> + /* We advance by two because we add one for items referenced through
> + * previous_funccal. */
> + current_copyID += COPYID_INC;
> + copyID = current_copyID;
> +
> /*
> * 1. Go through all accessible variables and mark all lists and dicts
> * with copyID.
> */
> +
> + /* Don't free variables in the previous_funccal list unless they are
> only
> + * referenced through previous_funccal. This must be first, because if
> + * the item is referenced elsewhere it must not be freed. */
> + for (fc = previous_funccal; fc != NULL; fc = fc->caller)
> + {
> + set_ref_in_ht(&fc->l_vars.dv_hashtab, copyID + 1);
> + set_ref_in_ht(&fc->l_avars.dv_hashtab, copyID + 1);
> + }
> +
> /* script-local variables */
> for (i = 1; i <= ga_scripts.ga_len; ++i)
> set_ref_in_ht(&SCRIPT_VARS(i), copyID);
> ***************
> *** 6546,6556 ****
> /* v: vars */
> set_ref_in_ht(&vimvarht, copyID);
>
> /*
> ! * 2. Go through the list of dicts and free items without the copyID.
> */
> for (dd = first_dict; dd != NULL; )
> ! if (dd->dv_copyID != copyID)
> {
> /* Free the Dictionary and ordinary items it contains, but don't
> * recurse into Lists and Dictionaries, they will be in the list
> --- 6564,6610 ----
> /* v: vars */
> set_ref_in_ht(&vimvarht, copyID);
>
> + /* Free lists and dictionaries that are not referenced. */
> + did_free = free_unref_items(copyID);
> +
> + /* check if any funccal can be freed now */
> + for (pfc = &previous_funccal; *pfc != NULL; )
> + {
> + if (can_free_funccal(*pfc, copyID))
> + {
> + fc = *pfc;
> + *pfc = fc->caller;
> + free_funccal(fc, TRUE);
> + did_free = TRUE;
> + did_free_funccal = TRUE;
> + }
> + else
> + pfc = &(*pfc)->caller;
> + }
> + if (did_free_funccal)
> + /* When a funccal was freed some more items might be garbage
> + * collected, so run again. */
> + (void)garbage_collect();
> +
> + return did_free;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Free lists and dictionaries that are no longer referenced.
> + */
> + static int
> + free_unref_items(copyID)
> + int copyID;
> + {
> + dict_T *dd;
> + list_T *ll;
> + int did_free = FALSE;
> +
> /*
> ! * Go through the list of dicts and free items without the copyID.
> */
> for (dd = first_dict; dd != NULL; )
> ! if ((dd->dv_copyID & COPYID_MASK) != (copyID & COPYID_MASK))
> {
> /* Free the Dictionary and ordinary items it contains, but don't
> * recurse into Lists and Dictionaries, they will be in the list
> ***************
> *** 6565,6576 ****
> dd = dd->dv_used_next;
>
> /*
> ! * 3. Go through the list of lists and free items without the copyID.
> ! * But don't free a list that has a watcher (used in a for loop),
> these
> ! * are not referenced anywhere.
> */
> for (ll = first_list; ll != NULL; )
> ! if (ll->lv_copyID != copyID && ll->lv_watch == NULL)
> {
> /* Free the List and ordinary items it contains, but don't recurse
> * into Lists and Dictionaries, they will be in the list of dicts
> --- 6619,6631 ----
> dd = dd->dv_used_next;
>
> /*
> ! * Go through the list of lists and free items without the copyID.
> ! * But don't free a list that has a watcher (used in a for loop), these
> ! * are not referenced anywhere.
> */
> for (ll = first_list; ll != NULL; )
> ! if ((ll->lv_copyID & COPYID_MASK) != (copyID & COPYID_MASK)
> ! && ll->lv_watch == NULL)
> {
> /* Free the List and ordinary items it contains, but don't recurse
> * into Lists and Dictionaries, they will be in the list of dicts
> ***************
> *** 6584,6603 ****
> else
> ll = ll->lv_used_next;
>
> - /* check if any funccal can be freed now */
> - for (pfc = &previous_funccal; *pfc != NULL; )
> - {
> - if (can_free_funccal(*pfc, copyID))
> - {
> - fc = *pfc;
> - *pfc = fc->caller;
> - free_funccal(fc, TRUE);
> - did_free = TRUE;
> - }
> - else
> - pfc = &(*pfc)->caller;
> - }
> -
> return did_free;
> }
>
> --- 6639,6644 ----
> ***************
> *** 18842,18847 ****
> --- 18883,18889 ----
> {
> hash_init(&dict->dv_hashtab);
> dict->dv_refcount = DO_NOT_FREE_CNT;
> + dict->dv_copyID = 0;
> dict_var->di_tv.vval.v_dict = dict;
> dict_var->di_tv.v_type = VAR_DICT;
> dict_var->di_tv.v_lock = VAR_FIXED;
> ***************
> *** 21294,21301 ****
> current_funccal = fc->caller;
> --depth;
>
> ! /* if the a:000 list and the a: dict are not referenced we can free the
> ! * funccall_T and what's in it. */
> if (fc->l_varlist.lv_refcount == DO_NOT_FREE_CNT
> && fc->l_vars.dv_refcount == DO_NOT_FREE_CNT
> && fc->l_avars.dv_refcount == DO_NOT_FREE_CNT)
> --- 21336,21343 ----
> current_funccal = fc->caller;
> --depth;
>
> ! /* If the a:000 list and the l: and a: dicts are not referenced we can
> ! * free the funccall_T and what's in it. */
> if (fc->l_varlist.lv_refcount == DO_NOT_FREE_CNT
> && fc->l_vars.dv_refcount == DO_NOT_FREE_CNT
> && fc->l_avars.dv_refcount == DO_NOT_FREE_CNT)
> ***************
> *** 21334,21340 ****
>
> /*
> * Return TRUE if items in "fc" do not have "copyID". That means they are
> not
> ! * referenced from anywhere.
> */
> static int
> can_free_funccal(fc, copyID)
> --- 21376,21382 ----
>
> /*
> * Return TRUE if items in "fc" do not have "copyID". That means they are
> not
> ! * referenced from anywhere that is in use.
> */
> static int
> can_free_funccal(fc, copyID)
>
>
> --
> Why I like vim:
>> I like VIM because, when I ask a question in this newsgroup, I get a
>> one-line answer. With xemacs, I get a 1Kb lisp script with bugs in it ;-)
>
> /// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
> /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
> \\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org ///
> \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
>
With this patch applied MacVim still crashes for me. Note that it
doesn't do that if I instead apply the second Nico's patch. These are
details of from gdb:
Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGBUS)
Exception Codes: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at 0x00000000000b7058
Crashed Thread: 0
(gdb) where
#0 0x0002afa1 in dict_free (d=0x35a42f0, recurse=1) at eval.c:6772
#1 0x0002b07a in dict_unref (d=0x35a42f0) at eval.c:6752
#2 0x0002a980 in clear_tv (varp=0x3413f60) at eval.c:18600
#3 0x0002c217 in vars_clear_ext (ht=0x8589c0, free_val=1) at eval.c:19037
#4 0x0002c25e in vars_clear (ht=0x34119f0) at eval.c:19009
#5 0x0002c285 in free_funccal (fc=0x858800, free_val=1) at eval.c:21512
#6 0x0002c6ee in garbage_collect () at eval.c:6579
#7 0x00075939 in before_blocking () at getchar.c:1473
#8 0x000dd53d in mch_inchar (buf=0x35a7001 "", maxlen=95, wtime=-1,
tb_change_cnt=21118) at os_unix.c:385
#9 0x00136ec5 in ui_inchar (buf=0x35a7001 "", maxlen=95, wtime=-1,
tb_change_cnt=21118) at ui.c:193
#10 0x00075c3a in inchar (buf=0x35a7001 "", maxlen=287, wait_time=-1,
tb_change_cnt=21118) at getchar.c:2959
#11 0x00078eda in vgetorpeek (advance=1) at getchar.c:2735
#12 0x00079441 in vgetc () at getchar.c:1552
#13 0x00079898 in safe_vgetc () at getchar.c:1757
#14 0x000c09ed in normal_cmd (oap=0xbffff350, toplevel=1) at normal.c:654
#15 0x00082d39 in main_loop (cmdwin=0, noexmode=0) at main.c:1255
#16 0x00086a87 in main (argc=54598128, argv=0x34119f0) at main.c:1002
(gdb) list
6767
6768 /* Remove the dict from the list of dicts for garbage collection. */
6769 if (d->dv_used_prev == NULL)
6770 first_dict = d->dv_used_next;
6771 else
6772 d->dv_used_prev->dv_used_next = d->dv_used_next;
6773 if (d->dv_used_next != NULL)
6774 d->dv_used_next->dv_used_prev = d->dv_used_prev;
6775
6776 /* Lock the hashtab, we don't want it to resize while
freeing items. */
(gdb) p *d
$44 = {
dv_refcount = -1073741822,
dv_hashtab = {
ht_mask = 3234897895,
ht_used = 11,
ht_filled = 18,
ht_locked = 1,
ht_error = 0,
ht_array = 0x85ee00,
ht_smallarray = {{
hi_hash = 1680060352,
hi_key = 0x34c692d "posStack"
}, {
hi_hash = 881893521,
hi_key = 0x347d13d "functionContainer"
}, {
hi_hash = 123778642,
hi_key = 0x342829d "wrap"
}, {
hi_hash = 1110333171,
hi_key = 0x3415ead "varPriority"
}, {
hi_hash = 122576644,
hi_key = 0x34bf01d "vars"
}, {
hi_hash = 2430892566,
hi_key = 0x34bde9d "wrapStartPos"
}, {
hi_hash = 1646883926,
hi_key = 0x34bd31d "tmplarr"
}, {
hi_hash = 2145903751,
hi_key = 0x34803ed "funcs"
}, {
hi_hash = 398141396,
hi_key = 0x34a1acd "lastPopup"
}, {
hi_hash = 2409478612,
hi_key = 0x34a295d "startColumn"
}, {
hi_hash = 3497526042,
hi_key = 0x341fc5d "stack"
}, {
hi_hash = 1528633632,
hi_key = 0x34a1c4d "wrappedNameTree"
}, {
hi_hash = 3594528268,
hi_key = 0x34bfb9d "tmpls"
}, {
hi_hash = 3360825129,
hi_key = 0x3487c5d "nameTree"
}, {
hi_hash = 0,
hi_key = 0x0
}, {
hi_hash = 2739356453,
hi_key = 0x3485b6d "keyword"
}}
},
dv_copyID = 1862,
dv_copydict = 0x3231203a,
dv_lock = 0 '\0',
dv_used_next = 0x34119f0,
dv_used_prev = 0xb6fb0
}
It looks like d->dv_refcount is invalid and d->dv_used_prev point is suspicious:
(gdb) p *d->dv_used_prev
$46 = {
dv_refcount = 533,
dv_hashtab = {
ht_mask = 552,
ht_used = 552,
ht_filled = 552,
ht_locked = 540,
ht_error = 547,
ht_array = 0x1f2,
ht_smallarray = {{
hi_hash = 96442,
hi_key = 0xba2feb00 <Address 0xba2feb00 out of bounds>
}, {
hi_hash = 8364,
hi_key = 0x60ba28eb <Address 0x60ba28eb out of bounds>
}, {
hi_hash = 3942645761,
hi_key = 0x161ba21 ""
}, {
hi_hash = 451608576,
hi_key = 0x17dba "\v#####"
}, {
hi_hash = 3121867520,
hi_key = 0x17e <Address 0x17e out of bounds>
}, {
hi_hash = 1387924715,
hi_key = 0xeb000001 <Address 0xeb000001 out of bounds>
}, {
hi_hash = 22264325,
hi_key = 0x4d8b0000 <Address 0x4d8b0000 out of bounds>
}, {
hi_hash = 608995784,
hi_key = 0x24148904 <Address 0x24148904 out of bounds>
}, {
hi_hash = 4293319400,
hi_key = 0xc84501ff <Address 0xc84501ff out of bounds>
}, {
hi_hash = 1003505151,
hi_key = 0x850fd075 <Address 0x850fd075 out of bounds>
}, {
hi_hash = 4294967067,
hi_key = 0xc6c87d8b <Address 0xc6c87d8b out of bounds>
}, {
hi_hash = 2105737223,
hi_key = 0x840f0010 <Address 0x840f0010 out of bounds>
}, {
hi_hash = 1409,
hi_key = 0x452bf889 <Address 0x452bf889 out of bounds>
}, {
hi_hash = 274041760,
hi_key = 0x72e90289 <Address 0x72e90289 out of bounds>
}, {
hi_hash = 2332033029,
hi_key = 0x1189144d <Address 0x1189144d out of bounds>
}, {
hi_hash = 2311355787,
hi_key = 0x2ce9ac7d <Address 0x2ce9ac7d out of bounds>
}}
},
dv_copyID = -1929379838,
dv_copydict = 0x4890146,
dv_lock = 36 '$',
dv_used_next = 0x4589ffff,
dv_used_prev = 0xfc085a0
}
I assume this is duble dealloc problem, but unfortunately I have no
idea how to track it down.
Hope it helps.
Kent
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
