Ingo Karkat wrote: > On 10/10/2011 03:43 PM, mattn wrote: > > I hope that <SNR> functions should be following after global > > functions. Is this a problem of sort? > > Currently, <SNR> functions are there before global functions. it's not > > useful. > > It's a good idea to show the <SNR> functions last. "Normal" users don't > use them, and the cryptic names look intimidating.
Agreed. Leaving them out would result in the strange behavior that you have to type a character to get more completions. > > However, If I want to find global function leading "z", I may feed that > > "<SNR> functions are not useful for complete". > > Wouldn't you then type z<Tab>, to only get functions starting with "z"? > The <SNR> functions wouldn't show up, then. > > > We should hear another's comment more. > > Here's another vote for keeping them in, at least when the "<SNR>" base > has already been typed (and preferably also at the end of the list of > all functions). > > -- regards, ingo -- Over the years, I've developed my sense of deja vu so acutely that now I can remember things that *have* happened before ... /// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
