I've tried creating a summary page which we can use to collect ideas about what is good/bad and how to improve in the future: http://vim-wiki.mawercer.de/wiki/topic/neobundle-vs-vam-merge
Shougo: When using vimproc and parallel processes, how do you feel about activation order? In some cases order does matter, do you preserve order ? VAM does have some sophisticated implementation about preserving manual patches (eg running diff, updating, then applying patch) when using .zip archives. Did anybody ever use this feature? I think I did too much on this topic. I eventually have more use casse for async processing of trees of tasks. (eg tagging multiple directories) - thus does it make sense to move such "logic" into its own plugin? The most important question is: Are plugin managers more important than fixing Vim (I mean both NeoBundle,VAM,Vundle,.. they all work reasonably well and don't take much of my time when getting their jobs done) Marc Weber -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
