Le samedi 15 mars 2014 13:55:22 UTC+1, Bram Moolenaar a écrit : > Celelibi wrote: > > > > > I reported a bug in the debian BTS, but found that it also apply to > > > upstream vim. > > > > > > Here it is: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=741400 > > > > > > In summary, it looks like vim do not support termcaps %e nor %c > > > (corresponding to terminfos kPRV and kNXT). They're supposed to > > > produce <S-PageUp> and <S-PageDown>. > > > > > > I think vim only produce <S-PageUp> or <S-PageDown> when it has an > > > exception for the given terminal. i.e. when it recognize the content > > > of the environment variable TERM and has a special case for it. > > > > > > I tried to look at the source code, but it's too complicated for the > > > amount of time I spent. > > > > What makes you think that %e and %c are the shifted next/previous page > > keys? The termcap manpage says: > > > > kN Key for next page > > kP Key for previous page > > > > %c shifted next key > > %e shifted previous key > > > > "next key" and "next page" are different. Perhaps it's just a > > coincidence that %c and %e contain the codes? Officially there are no > > entries for the shifted next/previous page keys. >
Yes, you're right. But I don't think it's a coincidence that xterm produce ^[[5~ for Prior or KP_Prior and ^[[5;2~ for Shift+KP_Prior. I think xterm just do the most sensful thing it can. Since there is no termcap for "shifted previous-page" it send "shifted previous" with an escape sequence that is nothing else than the escape sequence for "previous-page" with shift modifier. - Maybe what I should ask is that vim treat the "previous" key as an equivalent of "previous-page"? Or at least a way to tell vim that I want them equivalent whatever the modifiers it may encounter. - Or maybe that it loads ALL the termcap in the t_* options? And that it search for a termcap that match the FULL escape sequence before trying to parse the modifiers and search for the modifier-less version? What I mean for the second suggestion is that when I :set t_%e=^[[5;2~ then <C-K>^[[5;2~ make vim print <S-t_%8>. While %e is in the termcap/terminfo file. What really happen is not really clear in my head. Neither is the design of vim. I'm therefore a bit confused about the right way to go. Celelibi -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
