On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Carlo Baldassi <carlobalda...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, here is my attempt at a recursive version of the keepjumps command. > It's called lockjumps, and works in the same way as keepjumps except that: > 1) it's recursive > 2) it only locks the jumplist, it does not affect the marks list > > Again, it seems to work as intended, "make test" passes and valgrind too. > > The reason for not touching the marks is that: > 1) I think it is actually fairly common for functions/plugins/etc to use > marks in jumping around, e.g. calling "normal ``" to get back after a jump, > or having a mapping which does things like "ggdd``". It is much more uncommon > to use CTRL-O in a script I think. > 2) The marks can be set explicitly by the user and are much easier to control > from user code (e.g. it is trivial to write a save_marks()/restore_marks() > pair if needed).
In my case at least, allowing the marks to be modified defeats the purpose. And the inconsistency between :keepjumps (keeps '. '^ jumplist and changelist) and :lockjumps (keeps only jumplist...?) would be unpleasant. In your implementation, you could save the './'^/jumplist/changelist and then restore it after the script ends. This would allow plugins to use marks et. al. as needed but the user can use :keepjumps! to prevent side effects from the plugin. Justin M. Keyes -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
