On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Now that we have some functions with a common prefix, it seems to work > quite well. The older way of having read_xxx(), write_xxx(), > check_xxx() makes functions scatter. xxx_read(), xxx_write() and > xxx_check() looks better, easier to find what you are looking for. > > Anything against it?
Hmm, to make sure, let me confirm that: Are you changing older functions which do not have a common prefix? json*() and js*() functions are new, but, for example, readfile() is not new. There are many many plugins to use them. We should change them now. -- Takuya Fujiwara -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
